Reduced US force in Syria will be a face-saver for Trump and Erdogan

After first saying he was pulling out all US troops, Trump has bowed to pressure

Women and children who fled the Islamic State  group’s last embattled holdout of Baghouz wait to evacuate the area in Syria’s northern Deir Ezzor province, last Friday.  Photograph: Delil Souleiman/AFP/Getty Images

Women and children who fled the Islamic State group’s last embattled holdout of Baghouz wait to evacuate the area in Syria’s northern Deir Ezzor province, last Friday. Photograph: Delil Souleiman/AFP/Getty Images

 

Washington’s plan to retain a small group of peacekeeping troops in Syria is a tactical reversal of US president Donald Trump’s strategic decision to withdraw all US forces from that country now that the Islamic State terror group has lost its territorial base.

Under strong pressure from Congress and his generals, Trump agreed that 400 troops would be deployed for an unspecified period once 2,200 pulled out at the end of April.

Half the peacekeepers being retained are to patrol the Syrian-Turkish border with the aim of preventing clashes between US-supported Syrian Kurdish fighters and Turkish troops, while the remainder will be stationed at a US base in the south on the Syrian-Jordanian border.

The token deployment does not meet the Kurds’ demand for a foreign force of 1,500 to interpose between their fighters and the Turkish army. Washington had suggested that Western and Arab governments could dispatch troops for such a mission, but so far none has offered contingents.

Trump announced both the decisions to withdraw and retain a slim presence following phone calls with his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has threatened to drive the Syrian Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) from a 30-km wide “safe zone” in northern Syria.

Erdogan considers the YPG, an offshoot of Turkey’s insurgent Kurdish Workers’ Party, a terrorist organisation.

Honour his pledge

For Trump and Erdogan the continuing presence of US troops could be a face-saver: Trump would honour his pledge to pull out the main body of troops and Erdogan could postpone his oft-promised military intervention.

The UK and France have refused the Trump administration’s request to replace departing US forces but might contribute peacekeepers for as long as the US does, creating a red, white and blue line between Turkey’s red flags and the Kurds’ yellow banners.

While Britain’s ministry of defence refuses to comment on the number of UK special forces deployed in northern Syria, France has 1,100 troops there.

A Turkish “safe zone” on the Syrian side of the border would create fresh complications in the already-complex situation in Syria. Kurdish and Arab residents of the area could flee if the YPG is expelled. Erdogan proposes to settle hundreds of thousands of the 3.6 million Syrian refugees hosted by Turkey in the zone, which would be connected to Turkish utilities and services.

Kamal Alam, a visiting fellow at London’s Royal United Services Institute, told Al-Jazeera that the two Syrian areas occupied by Turkey in 2016 and 2018 look “like a state within a state. Syria has rightly called this a violation of the UN Charter.”

The US also opposes Turkish military action and has vowed to protect the YPG

Russia and Syria say that the Syrian army must deploy along the Turkish border and reassert control of the vast area held by the Kurds, who did not join the insurgency against the government in Damascus. In exchange for such a deal, the Kurds demand autonomy in a federal state.

Strong central rule

Damascus contends strong central rule must be re-established to reunify the country and argues that Turkey will not accept a Kurdish autonomous zone, as this could encourage Turkey’s Kurds to step up their violent self-rule campaign. In 2003-04 Turkey opposed the creation of a Kurdish autonomous region in Iraq for the same reason. Ankara is in no mood to be ignored a second time.

The US also opposes Turkish military action and has vowed to protect the YPG. However, Washington and Ankara agree that the Kurdish-controlled 25 per cent of Syria should not return to Damascus for the time being.

Both want to use this territory as leverage to force Syrian president Bashar al-Assad to step down, although this would be strongly resisted by his allies Russia and Iran, which have pledged not only to ensure his tenure but also to restore all Syrian territory to Damascus’s rule.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.