D7 residents object to co-living scheme beside Black Church

Durkan scheme which flanks former church gets 25 individual objections

The former Black Church at St Mary’s Place in Dublin’s north inner city. Photograph: William Murphy.

The former Black Church at St Mary’s Place in Dublin’s north inner city. Photograph: William Murphy.

 

Residents of Dublin’s north inner city are appealing to An Bord Pleanála against a decision by Dublin City Council to grant permission for a co-living development flanking the former Black Church at St Mary’s Place. The Durkan scheme generated 25 individual objections as well as an observation by An Taisce.

The council’s planners required the number of units to be reduced from 121 to 114, but residents of the Mountjoy Street area are still unhappy. They maintain that the area has become “completely overwhelmed” by schemes intended for transient living, including five student housing blocks, two hotels and three hostels.

There is also concern about the impact of the proposal on the Black Church itself — designed by John Semple and mentioned in Ulysses — even though it was deconsecrated in the 1960s and is now used as offices. Ironically, the former church was used as a venue to display the first development plan for Dublin City in 1967.

A montage showing the proposed co-living development flanking Black Church.
A montage showing the proposed co-living development flanking Black Church.

Graham Hickey, conservation officer at Dublin Civic Trust, who was writing in a personal capacity, said the replacement of a three-storey derelict building on the corner of Mountjoy Street by a five-storey block designed by PA Architects “with an utterly incongruous glazed tower-like structure exhibits, quite simply, zero reference to context”.

Although it has been in the planning process since last December, there has been a notable increase in planning applications for co-living schemes over recent weeks due to fears among developers that the new Minister for Housing and Planning, Darragh O’Brien (Fianna Fáil), takes a more jaundiced view of the concept than his predecessor, Eoghan Murphy (Fine Gael).

It is understood that a major review of Murphy’s regulations permitting co-living schemes is now under way, particularly in the context of the current pandemic. Unlike Murphy, who once likened them to “very trendy boutique hotels”, O’Brien is dubious about the idea of residents sharing lounge and kitchen facilities and running the risk of contracting Covid-19.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.