Dan Evans banned for a year after testing positive for cocaine

British tennis player failed the drugs test at the Barcelona Open in April

British tennis player Dan Evans has been banned for one year following his positive test for cocaine in April, the International Tennis Federation has announced. Photo: Mike Egerton/PA Wire

British tennis player Dan Evans has been banned for one year following his positive test for cocaine in April, the International Tennis Federation has announced. Photo: Mike Egerton/PA Wire

 

The British tennis player Dan Evans has been banned for one year following his positive test for cocaine in April, the International Tennis Federation has announced.

The suspension has been backdated to the time of the 27-year-old’s failed test, which means Evans could return to action on April 24th 2018.

Evans did not deny taking cocaine, telling the ITF, which oversees the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme, that he had done so on April 20th.

The drug is only banned in competition and Evans denied taking it during the tournament, saying it had got into his system via permitted medication that he had stored in the same pocket of his washbag in which he had previously kept the cocaine.

Evans’s expert, Dr Pascal Kintz, argued the very small amount of the drug present in Evans’s test was consistent with inadvertent contamination, and that was accepted by the ITF.

That explanation, coupled with Evans’s prompt acceptance that he had taken the drug, resulted in a more lenient ban that might have been expected.

The ITF decision read: “Mr Evans cannot establish that he bears no fault or negligence for his violation because his conduct in taking cocaine and then storing it in his washbag, in the same pocket as his medication, was a departure from the rigorous standard of utmost caution required of all players under the TADP.

“On the other hand, based on the circumstances of the inadvertent contamination, the ITF accepts that the player has established No Significant Fault or Negligence for his violation triggering a discretion to reduce the two-year period of ineligibility by up to 12 months.

“In all of the circumstances of this case, including the time and expenses saved by reaching an agreed outcome rather than having a disputed hearing, the ITF accepts that a 12-month reduction is within the range of reasonable outcomes.”

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.