PSNI asked to investigate fraud claims in cash for ash scheme
US state department urges Northern politicians to quickly restore powersharing
Former minister for health Edwin Poots accuses opposition Assembly members of mounting a “hate campaign” against former first minister. Photograph: Kevin Boyes
The “cash for ash” scheme encouraged businesses – and later householders – to install woodchip boilers. However, there was no cap imposed initially, meaning the more heat a business generated, the higher the subsidy it received. The scheme could result in an overspend to the Northern Ireland taxpayer of up to £490 million.
UUP economy spokesman Steve Aiken said he wrote to the police after the DUP Minister for the Economy Simon Hamilton on Monday did not contest suggestions some users of the scheme had done so fraudulently.
“The general public will be confused to hear from an Executive Minister that fraud has been detected in a government-sponsored scheme, yet the Police Service of Northern Ireland has not even been notified about any of this,” said Mr Aiken.
This indicated, it is understood, that these were mainly poultry farmers who used the woodchip boilers to heat chicken houses where the birds were reared.
Meanwhile, as Northern Ireland prepares for Assembly elections on March 2nd, the US has urged a quick resumption of devolved government after polling day.
“The United States remains committed to supporting a more peaceful and prosperous Northern Ireland. To this end, we urge all political parties to focus on quickly finding a way forward to the resumption of stable devolved governance,” the US state department said in a statement.
“We also encourage civil society leaders to continue their vital work building a better, shared future. Restored devolved democratic institutions and an engaged, constructive citizenry can best take Northern Ireland forward,” it added.
Mr Poots, an MLA for Lagan Valley, said that “everybody has culpability” in the failure to put cost controls on the RHI scheme.
During a discussion in the Assembly of a joint motion from the SDLP and the UUP calling for a public inquiry into this scheme, Mr Poots defended his party leader.
“Arlene Foster did not devise the scheme. She was presented with it. She did not ask for it to be changed by civil servants so that it was different from the UK one,” said Mr Poots.
He said that nobody saw the flaws in the scheme, including the British gas and electricity regulator, Ofgem. He added that when she was minister for enterprise, trade and investment, Ms Foster brought “tens of thousands of jobs” to Northern Ireland.
“Yet members are fixated with a hate campaign against her,” he added.
UUP leader Mike Nesbitt said the estimated £85,000 overspend per day on RHI could have been used to assist victims of the Troubles and of institutional abuse. “It is not an Orange issue. It is not a Green issue. It is an issue of right and wrong, of competence and incompetence,” he said.
“Yet, when you raise that issue in the chamber and suggest that there is such a concept as ministerial responsibility, some parties now make that synonymous with hate crime and misogyny. How desperate? How embarrassing for the integrity of these institutions?”