Irritation with London over Brexit now bordering on anger
Brussels likely to sit tight while MPs get another chance to block no-deal on February 14th
Tánaiste Simon Coveney on UK approach: “It’s like saying give me what I want or I’m jumping out the window.” Photograph: Niall Carson/PA Wire
Ahead of Tuesday’s votes in the House of Commons, Theresa May acknowledged there was a “limited appetite” in Brussels for renegotiating the withdrawal agreement and Downing Street was braced for a negative reaction. But the response from Dublin, Brussels and other European capitals on Wednesday went beyond a simple rejection of the prime minister’s call for a negotiation, reflecting a level of irritation with London that edges on anger.
Tánaiste Simon Coveney complained that May had recommended that her party should vote against a deal that she herself had negotiated.
“It’s like saying give me what I want or I’m jumping out the window. We owe it to the people of Ireland, north and south. We cannot approach this negotiation on the basis of threats,” he said.
“Voting against a no deal does not rule out the risk of no deal. This agreement remains the best and only means to ensure an orderly withdrawal. This agreement will not be renegotiated,” he said.
Austrian chancellor Sebastian Kurz, French president Emmanuel Macron and the official spokesman of German chancellor Angela Merkel all ruled out reopening the withdrawal agreement. And Juncker warned Britain against hoping that the EU would throw Ireland under the bus at the last minute.
Consult with MPs
By identifying the backstop as the sole obstacle to supporting the Brexit deal, however, Tuesday’s vote has the potential to open a door for May into further negotiations. Over the next few days, she will consult with MPs before formulating a proposal on the backstop to be presented to the EU early next week.
She told MPs on Wednesday that she was looking at a time limit or a unilateral exit mechanism for the backstop, along with “alternative measures” based on technological and administrative measures on customs. The EU has already rejected a time limit and a unilateral exit mechanism and dismissed technological solutions for the Border as fanciful.
If May can limit her demands to proposals that are negotiable if not immediately acceptable to Brussels, she has at least a ghost of a chance of winning a hearing from EU leaders. Her task is complicated, however, by the unreasonable demands of her new-found allies among Conservative Brexiteers. And her promise to give MPs another chance to block a no-deal Brexit on February 14th offers EU leaders an incentive to do nothing at all for two weeks.