Graham Dwyer ruling: Flanagan says AG will be consulted on court ruling
Charlie Flanagan says legal framework ‘needs to be modernised’
Graham Dwyer arriving at the Four Courts for a Supreme Court hearing in 2013. File photograph: Collins
Dwyer won an important legal battle against the State and the Garda Commissioner as part of his bid to overturn his conviction for the murder of Elaine O’Hara. In his action Dwyer, who denies killing Ms O’Hara, a childcare worker, claimed that data gathered from his phone, under the 2011 Communications (Retention of Data) Act, should not have been used at his 2015 trial before the Central Criminal Court. Dwyer, who was not present in court for the ruling, will now use the High Court’s findings as part of his appeal against his conviction.
Mr Flanagan said in a statement after the ruling: “This is a very detailed and lengthy judgment in what is a very complex and dynamic area of the law.
“The Court’s judgment will have to be considered very carefully in order to identify exactly what actions are necessary and the advice of the Attorney General will have to be taken in that regard.”
He added that the “current legal framework allowing for access to communications meta-data to combat criminals and terrorists needs to be modernised in light of evolving jurisprudence.”
Communications meta-data does not include content but involves information such as origin, destination, route, time, date, size, duration or type of underlying service.