Charleton Tribunal raises issue of sources

Courts have recognised a limited right to protect sources is an essential pillar of a free press, but there remains an unresolved gap between judges and journalists

 

Mr Justice Peter Charleton has set off into an ethical and legal minefield with his announcement on Tuesday that his tribunal into alleged attempts to discredit Garda Sergeant Maurice McCabe will inquire into the limits to journalistic privilege or the protection of sources.

The tribunal has been tasked specifically to find out if the media was used as an “instrument for the dissemination of lies”, an inquiry that is enormously important to journalists.

But the protection of sources is so deeply ingrained in the ethos of journalism that he is unlikely to find any journalist willing to divulge their sources, even if they felt they had been used. Most will say that they would not be able to function as journalists the day they were no longer able to assure sources of a willingness to defy even the courts to protect their anonymity.

“Here, the privilege, if there is one,”the judge asked, “may attach to a communication to a journalist in the interests of providing truthful information to the public, but is it possible that such a privilege does not apply to using the media as an instrument of naked deceit?”

Indeed, it is arguable that the privilege relationship, specifically the ethical obligation to protecting anonymity, is transformed, and effectively nullified, if the journalist is substantially misled by that source about the substance or purpose of a leak.

But does that logic apply to the McCabe case, when no journalist actually wrote the story being planted to discredit him? Either they did not believe it or did not regard it as pertinent – either way the journalists’ obligation to protect their source was not fundamentally compromised by the misleading information.

Although the courts here and in Europe have recognised that a limited right to protect sources is an essential pillar of a free press, there remains an unresolved gap between judges and journalists.

At issue, which of them should ultimately determine whether there has been a breakdown in the journalist/source compact sufficient to void a commitment to source protection.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.