Omar Mateen and the FBI: What else could have been done?
Orlando shootings raise the question: How could he attract attention, yet not be stopped?
Omar Mateen, who had attracted the attention of the FBI for claims about connections with terrorists, killed 49 people when he opened fire in a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, last Sunday. Photograph: MySpace/AP File
Every day, in FBI offices around the US, agents leaf through classified counterterrorism documents on American citizens one last time. They reread informant reports and review surveillance logs. And then they close the case and walk away.
It is a weighty decision, one that supervisors closely review. But with up to 10,000 FBI terrorism investigations open at any given time, there is little time for hand-wringing. The nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida, in which a gunman killed 49 people, has brought unusual attention to a seemingly mundane process. For 10 months, FBI agents investigated the gunman, Omar Mateen, but closed the investigation after following a standard checklist. FBI supervisors approved the decision. Managers in Washington, who can reverse any decision to close a case, were notified.
Officials said there was nothing particularly remarkable about the decision until Sunday’s predawn shooting. On Tuesday, the FBI was scrutinizing Mateen’s computer use, trying to learn how much his wife knew before the attack. Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged a thorough investigation that would also address “if there are lessons we can learn to prevent another tragedy.”
But perhaps the biggest question raised by this episode, as it was after the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013 and the shooting in Garland, Texas, last year, was why the perpetrator’s behaviour had been alarming enough to attract the attention of the FBI, but could not be stopped.
The answer is in part a reflection of American vigilance in the era of “see something, say something”. Tens of thousands of counterterrorism tips flow to the FBI each year. Some are legitimate. Others come from vengeful ex-spouses or people casting suspicion on Arab-Americans.
Thousands of investigations are opened and closed. Right now, law enforcement officials say, the FBI is investigating 1,000 potential “homegrown violent extremists,” the majority of whom are most likely tied to or inspired by Islamic State. Between 50 and 100 are considered the highest priority.
The flood of leads is so relentless that, years ago, counterterrorism agents hung an 18-inch section of fire hose outside their office suite in Northern Virginia as a symbol of their mission. Intelligence agencies in Europe and the Middle East face similar challenges, particularly with the rise of Islamic State. But in the United States, Americans enjoy the unique protections of the First and Second Amendments. Criticizing, or even hating, the US government is not a crime. Neither is declaring support for Islamic State or buying a gun.
The number of agents working on terrorism cases is classified and changes with the threat, but across the country it amounts to several thousand, along with countless analysts. Sorting out angry Americans talking tough from would-be terrorists is among their biggest challenges.
In Mateen’s case, co-workers said in 2013 that he had boasted of ties to the terrorist groups Hezbollah and al-Qaeda. The remarks prompted the local sheriff to request his removal from the St Lucie County Courthouse in Fort Pierce, Florida, where he worked as a security guard.
The security contractor transferred him to work at a residential golfing community, and the sheriff alerted the FBI.
Government officials said his claim had been dubious from the beginning. Hezbollah is a Shia group; al-Qaeda is Sunni. But agents opened what is known as a preliminary investigation. They secretly followed him and monitored his movements. They interviewed him twice, and dispatched an informant to get close to him in an investigation that spanned nearly a year.
“I think the FBI has an incredibly hard job, because this guy seems like a lone wolf,” said Caroline Frederickson, the president of the American Constitution Society, a frequent critic of the agency. “He was an American citizen born in the United States. Law enforcement has been working its butt off to figure out what else could be done.”
This dilemma is not new, but it has become more acute in recent years. For years after the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, the FBI used al-Qaeda’s rigid hierarchy against the terrorist group.
Government experts knew how plots got hatched and who approved them. They knew the terrorism pedigree of the key figures, and monitored travel to watch for people training in camps.
Today, Islamic State encourages anyone to take up arms in its name. Travel and training are unnecessary. Veteran counterterrorism agents ruefully note that the difference between America’s latest school shooting and its latest terrorist attack is whether the gunman praised the Islamic State regardless of whether he had any actual ties to the group.
Preventing those attacks is a fundamentally different mission, said James W McJunkin, a former senior FBI official who oversaw terrorism cases for years during al-Qaeda’s heyday. “It’s the counterterrorism equivalent of ‘How do you prevent someone from robbing a liquor store?’” he said.
After receiving a briefing Tuesday from investigators, Rep Adam Schiff, D-Calif, said that Mateen appeared to have been motivated by a mixture of violent radicalisation and hatred for gays and lesbians. “The picture is filling in, though there are still a lot of unanswered questions,” he said.
Among those questions is whether Mateen’s wife knew about his plans. His wife, Noor Zahi Salman, told the FBI that she had driven him to the Pulse nightclub at some point before the attack and that she had also been with him when he bought ammunition, a senior law enforcement official said. She said she had tried to talk him out of waging an attack, the official said.
Her statements were first reported by NBC News. “There’s an indication that she was with him in certain parts of the process, and we’re sorting through it,” said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation is at an early stage. “We don’t know what’s true and what’s not.”
Salman is not in custody, the official said. While a person who withholds knowledge of a crime could face criminal charges, she is not facing imminent arrest, and no decisions have been made on whether she might be prosecuted, the official said.
James B Comey, the FBI director, has said that Mateen was on a watch list while his investigation was under way. Once it was closed, he was removed from the list, as is required. “We don’t keep people under investigation indefinitely,” he said.
Even if Mateen had remained on the watch list, it would not have stopped him from buying a gun. Congress blocked an attempt last year to give the FBI the power to block gun sales to people on terrorism watch lists. Had he been on a watch list, however, agents would have been alerted to the gun sale.
“Certainly in retrospect in this case we would have liked to have known about it,” Deputy Attorney General Sally Q Yates said. She said the US justice department would consider a new policy in which the FBI is alerted on gun sales to people who were previously under investigation for terrorism.
The National Rifle Association moved quickly to quash discussion of new gun policies. In a piece for USA Today, Chris W Cox, the group’s executive director, blamed federal authorities for not doing more to stop Mateen. “His former co-workers reported violent and racist comments,” Mr Cox wrote. “Unfortunately, the Obama administration’s political correctness prevented anything from being done about it.”
New York Times