UK to purge Huawei from 5G by 2027, angering China

Seven-year lag will delay UK rollout of 5G

British prime minister Boris Johnson has ordered the complete purging of Huawei equipment from Britain's 5G network by the end of 2027, risking the ire of China by signalling that the world's biggest telecoms equipment maker is not welcome in the West.

As Britain prepares to cast off from the European Union, fears over the security of Huawei have forced Mr Johnson to choose between global rivals the United States and China.

He had been under intense pressure from US president Donald Trump, while Beijing had warned London, which has sought to court China in recent years, that billions in investment would be at risk if it sided with Washington.

Reversing a January decision to allow Huawei to supply up to 35 per cent of the non-core 5G network, Mr Johnson banned British telecoms operators from buying any 5G equipment from Huawei by year-end and gave them seven years to rip out existing gear.


“This has not been an easy decision, but it is the right one for the UK telecoms networks, for our national security and our economy, both now and indeed in the long run,” digital minister Oliver Dowden told parliament.

“By the time of the next election, we will have implemented in law an irreversible path for the complete removal of Huawei equipment from our 5G networks.”

The reason given for the about-turn was the impact of new US sanctions on chip technology, which Britain’s National Cyber Security Centre – part of the GCHQ eavesdropping agency – had told ministers meant Huawei was not a reliable supplier.

White House national security adviser Robert O’Brien said Britain’s action reflected a growing consensus that Huawei and other untrusted vendors posed a threat to national security because they remained “beholden to the Chinese Communist Party”.

According to a law introduced in 2017 under Chinese president Xi Jinping, Chinese companies have an obligation to support and co-operate in China’s national intelligence work.

‘Disappointing and wrong’

China’s ambassador to Britain Liu Xiaoming called the decision “disappointing and wrong”.

“It has become questionable whether the UK can provide an open, fair and non-discriminatory business environment for companies from other countries,” he said.

The ban will delay the rollout of 5G – cast as the nervous system of the future economy – by two to three years, and add costs of up to £2 billion.

The December 31st 2027 deadline was not as bad as British telecoms operators such as BT, Vodafone and Three had feared. They were concerned that they would be forced to spend billions of pounds to rip out Huawei equipment much more quickly.

BT said £500 million already earmarked to comply with the earlier cap would cover its costs. Its shares closed up 4 per cent.

Hanging up on Huawei marks an end to what former prime minister David Cameron cast as a “golden era” of ties which saw Britain pushed as Europe’s top destination for Chinese capital.

But London has been dismayed by a crackdown in Hong Kong and the perception China did not tell the whole truth over the novel coronavirus outbreak.

Huawei said the decision was more about US trade policy than security. “It threatens to move Britain into the digital slow lane, push up bills and deepen the digital divide,” a spokesman said.

In what some have compared to the Cold War antagonism with the Soviet Union, the US is worried that 5G dominance could lead towards Chinese technological supremacy.

After Australia first raised alarms about the risk of 5G being hijacked by a hostile state, worries in the West about Huawei have mounted.

The US calls the company an agent of the Chinese Communist state – a view widely supported in Mr Johnson’s Conservative Party. Huawei denies it spies for China and says the US wants to frustrate its growth because no US company offers the same technology at a competitive price.

In a tweet, US secretary of state Mike Pompeo said the British decision “advances Transatlantic security in the #5G era while protecting citizens’ privacy, national security, and free-world values.” – Reuters