Covid booster dose gives 100% protection against severe infection – study

Johnson & Johnson study looks at impact of booster two months after original vaccination

A booster dose of Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine provided 100 per cent protection against severe disease when given two months after the first inoculation. Photograph: Justin Tallis/AFP via Getty Images

A booster dose of Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine provided 100 per cent protection against severe disease when given two months after the first inoculation. Photograph: Justin Tallis/AFP via Getty Images

 

A booster dose of Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine provided 100 per cent protection against severe disease when given two months after the first inoculation, according to widely anticipated data that suggests it increases the potency of the one-time shot.

The booster was 94 per cent effective at preventing symptomatic Covid infections in the US portion of the Phase III trial, and 75 per cent effective overall when it was given 56 days after the initial dose, the company said in a statement Tuesday.

A second study found the additional shot spurred a 12-fold increase in production of antibodies against Covid when it was given six months after the first.

The results come as many developed nations turn to booster shots to address waning protection from some vaccines and the rise of the more infectious delta variant, which is sparking new outbreaks globally. The move has raised questions about the level of protection afforded by the existing shots and the equitable distribution of the vaccines now available.

“Our single-shot vaccine generates strong immune responses and long-lasting immune memory,” Mathai Mammen, global head of research and development for Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen drug unit, said in the statement. “When a booster of the Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccine is given, the strength of protection against Covid-19 further increases.”

The time period between the initial vaccine and the booster shot was significant, the research showed.

When the second dose was given two months after the first shot, it triggered a four-to-sixfold increase in antibody levels – less than the 12-fold gain seen when it was given six months after the initial injection.

Most vaccinated people in Ireland have received the two-dose messenger RNA vaccines made by Pfizer and BioNTech, with a smaller group getting J&J’s single shot inoculation. Originally, 2.1 million doses of the J&J vaccine were scheduled for delivery this year but it suffered supply issues and was then phased out by the HSE in favour of the Pfizer jab.

Booster Decision

The US Food and Drug Administration is nearing a decision on whether to authorize a third shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for vulnerable people who have already received the normal two-dose schedule. Last Friday, a panel of FDA advisers rejected Pfizer’s proposal to broadly recommend a third dose, and instead voted in favour of only giving it to people at high risk, including those 65 and older. The agency, which doesn’t have to abide by the panel’s advice, is expected to make a decision within days.

Moderna, which also makes a two-dose mRNA vaccine for Covid, has applied to the FDA for emergency authorisation of its Covid-19 booster shot. The agency is expected to consider the application in the coming weeks.

That has left the smaller number of people who received the J&J vaccine, which proved less effective than the mRNA shots in clinical trials, waiting for clarity on whether they too will need boosters, and if so , when.

Separately in its statement, J&J said that a single dose of its vaccine provided strong protection that remained stable through July. The real world study compared 390,000 people in the US given J&J’s shot to 1.5 million who were unvaccinated.

The immunisation reduced hospitalisations by 81 per cent and infections by 79 per cent, the company said. There was no evidence the protection ebbed over time, including after the delta variant came to dominate, it said.

J&J has provided the available data to US regulators and plans to submit it to regulators elsewhere as well as the World Health Organization. – Bloomberg