New Zealand press react: SBW ban sparks rare selection debate

Kiwi media address Hansen’s midfield quandry with Gatland the weekend winner

It was Warren Gatland’s weekend in Wellington. Photograph: David Davies/PA

It was Warren Gatland’s weekend in Wellington. Photograph: David Davies/PA

 

We’re all square.

Saturday morning’s 24-21 victory in Wellington means the Lions head into next weekend’s final Test match against the All Blacks at Eden Park knowing they are a win away from immortality.

And as if consigning New Zealand to a first home Test defeat since 2009 wasn’t enough, the tourists were handed two considerable boons on Sunday.

As expected, Sonny Bill Williams’ moment of madness in ‘The Cake-Tin’ has brought his series to a premature end - and he can now concentrate on boxing for four weeks.

Things got even sweeter for Warren Gatland when it was confirmed Sean O’Brien would escape similar punishment after he was cited for an incident with Waisake Naholo.

O’Brien has been one of the Lions best performers thus far and his availability - coupled with a clean slate injury-wise after Wellington - saves Gatland any real selection headaches ahead of Auckland.

Ringmaster

And having spent the fall-out from the first Test asking how the Lions could possibly bounce back against the mighty All Blacks, the New Zealand press are now treating Gatland like a ringmaster rather than a clown.

For the New Zealand Herald, Patrick McKendry writes: “From the disappointment of last week to the high of a victory over the All Blacks on their home turf, Sonny Bill Williams’ four-match suspension, and the prospect of a few days of R and R in Queenstown, life must feel pretty good for Warren Gatland right now.”

Opposite number Steve Hansen, however, now has a SBW-shaped hole to plug in his midfield.

It has been rare on this tour for Kiwi press to concentrate on the All Blacks rather than the tourists - but SBW and Gatland’s team selection are now their focus.

Mouth-watering

Also in the NZ Herald, Chris Rattue writes: “The Lions second Test victory has set up a mouth-watering third Test showdown, and that rarest of things in recent All Black history - selection debate.

Jack Goodhue to centre? How about goalkicking Jordie Barrett for a sluggish Israel Dagg at fullback? Charlie Faumuina for Owen Franks? Jeez, maybe even Luke Romano’s ball carrying power for Sam Whitelock, who was ineffective at Westpac Stadium. Aaron Smith was ponderous, Aaron Cruden disastrous, Rieko Ioane lacked test nous.”

However, there does seems to be a consensus both at home and down under that Saturday’s result was ‘good for rugby.’

Indeed, in his column for the NZ Herald, All Blacks legend Justin Marshall writes: “To be in Wellington for that Test and to see the fans of both teams fully engaged in an electric atmosphere was amazing. The game needs it.”

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.