Irish Times view on the CervicalCheck report: a system that was doomed to fail

Astonishing crassness, insensitivity and malignant paternalism displayed by some doctors

Dr Gabriel Scally has published a 200-page report into the CervicalCheck scandal. The report says the current policy and practice in relation to open disclosure in the health service was “deeply contradictory and unsatisfactory”. Video: Bryan O'Brien

 

The publication of the inquiry into the CervicalCheck controversy is the first opportunity for women directly affected to read an objective assessment of the debacle. Public health specialist Dr Gabriel Scally was appointed in May to chair an independent scoping inquiry to establish the facts after it emerged the screening service failed to tell women with cancer of the cervix what clinical audits of their smear tests had found.

Although the inquiry was non-statutory and could not apportion individual blame, Scally and his team have forensically examined documentation and spoken with key figures, not least the many women affected. His conclusions are stark: there were many indications that the system in place “was doomed to fail at some point”. He found a demonstrable deficit of clear governance and reporting lines between CervicalCheck, the National Screening Service and the management structures of the HSE. In a conclusion with ramifications for the wider health system, the Scally report says current policy and practice on open disclosure in the health service is “deeply contradictory and unsatisfactory”.

A stand-out strength of the report is the time and care afforded to the women involved. Extraordinarily, Scally found it was not just the original non-disclosure, but the rushed and unsatisfactory nature of later individual meetings that affected women adversely. The crassness and insensitivity displayed by medical professionals in some of these conversations is astonishing, reflecting a malignant paternalism, largely inflicted by male doctors. In Scally’s words, it varied from “unsatisfactory and inappropriate, to damaging, hurtful and offensive”. The Medical Council and other professional bodies must face up to their responsibilities in this regard.

Scally sets out a considered case in suggesting a commission of investigation – currently planned by Government – is now not needed. But a decision must be carefully weighed, taking due account of the views of women involved.

It is encouraging to note that women have continued to support cervical cancer screening since this controversy arose. Critically, Scally says he is satisfied with the quality processes in the laboratories where smears are currently examined. He affirms a role for CervicalCheck in the future: “With significant system change, effective leadership, improved clinical and public health medicine engagement, plus new and powerful patient advocacy, there is no reason why CervicalCheck should not deliver an outstanding service for the women of Ireland”.

Screening for disease is, and will remain, an inexact science but cervical screening has saved lives in the Republic. Decisive political action, in response to Scally’s recommendations, is essential to ensure it continues to do so.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.