GAA Congress: Burn-out issues addressed but reforms fizzle out

Disappointing debates end with several proposals failing to make two-thirds majority

The GAA Congress voted for a mark in football for high catches, but proposals to bring All-Ireland finals forward didn’t fly. Photograph: Donall Farmer/Inpho

The GAA Congress voted for a mark in football for high catches, but proposals to bring All-Ireland finals forward didn’t fly. Photograph: Donall Farmer/Inpho

 

Although the GAA director general Páraic Duffy said that he was disappointed with the outcomes of a number of Saturday’s debates, the weekend’s annual congress has made significant progress in addressing one the association’s biggest problems: burn-out.

It has also been a personal vindication for Duffy, who launched a discussion paper in November synthesising proposals from previous reports, intended to resolve issues relating to young player burn-out, over-training and the chaotically inadequate provision of club fixtures. He also intervened to argue the merits of the relevant motions during the weekend’s debates.

Friday night’s decisions to re-grade minor inter-county as under-17 and bring the under-21 football equivalent forward to under-20 in a strictly developmental context – played in the summer with participants ineligible for senior intercounty – were measures always regarded by Croke Park officials as of immense importance in reducing the training and fixtures burden on young players.

Progress made

The problems arose on Saturday when congress appeared to be suffering from reform fatigue and none of the proposals intended to address the club fixtures issue – bringing forward the All-Ireland finals, restricting replays to All-Ireland and provincial finals and abolishing the intermediate hurling and junior football All-Irelands – attained the two-thirds vote, with support at 61, 54, 65 and 61 per cent respectively.

Asked for his overall view on this year’s congress, Duffy was a little regretful.

“The burn-out ones were actually good, but disappointed with Saturday. Not disappointed with Congress because we got really good votes, but we didn’t get two-thirds. Bring All-Irelands back two weeks, replays, get rid of intermediate hurling and junior football, every one of them Congress supported, but we didn’t get the two-thirds and that was the issue. I’m disappointed with that.”

He said that he didn’t believe the failure to bring forward the All-Irelands by two weeks would impact on plans to introduce a calendar year into club football – by staging All-Ireland club finals in December rather than on St Patrick’s Day.

“We’ll look at that now in light of this year’s decision, but it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s ruled out, no.”

Speaking about Friday’s withdrawal of the Central Council motion to provide an All-Ireland B championship, the president Aogán Ó Fearghail said that certain counties for whom the proposal had been designed had “changed their minds”, prompting the decision to drop the idea.

There were other interesting decisions taken. Jarlath Burns, chair of the Standing Committee on the Playing Rules, guided through the acceptance of the mark in football to reward the high catch. His arguments on preserving the skill by creating incentives – any catch of a kick-out that has travelled at least 45 metres will earn a free kick or the option of playing on – resonated with delegates.

Lost skill

There was another victory for the top table when the Dublin motion to ensure that all televised championship matches should be available free to air was heavily defeated, by 15 per cent to 85.

The proposal was supported by only one other county, Donegal, and widely opposed, including by former president Nickey Brennan, on the grounds that it would undermine the competition necessary for the association to get full value for its media rights and also that commercial matters should be left up to the GAA’s Management Committee and staff.

An Antrim motion to allow the winners of the Christy Ring Cup access to the same year’s Leinster championship was passed by an unexpectedly large margin, 80 per cent to 20.

“We need to look at that motion very carefully and how it will be implemented,” said Duffy.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.