Sir, - Lucinda Murrihy’s thoughtful letter (“The real meaning of inclusion”, Letters, July 10th), highlights a lesson that extends well beyond disability.
The issue she describes was not the existence of a safety concern. Organisations routinely have to balance competing priorities. The more important question is what happened next.
Too often, we mistake the first “no” for the final answer.
The question Lucinda asks – “What alternative would make his participation possible?” – is one every leader, public body and business should ask. It moves the conversation from compliance to curiosity, from seeing constraints as the end of the discussion to treating them as the beginning of better thinking.
READ MORE
Leadership is revealed not simply in the decisions we make, but in the quality of the questions we ask before making them. The strongest organisations are not those with the most policies. They are those where people are encouraged to exercise judgement, ask one more question and look for ways to achieve safety and inclusion, rather than assuming they are mutually exclusive.
As Lucinda’s letter reminds us, inclusion is rarely built through grand gestures. More often, it is shaped by the countless everyday decisions that determine whether people simply have access, or whether they genuinely belong. - Yours, etc.,
SUZANNE WARREN,
Boyle,
Co Roscommon.
