Syria peace talks to wrap up with little sign of progress
UN mediator frustrated by failure to get agreement on aid convoy for Homs
A girl plays with a ball along a street in the besieged area of Homs yesterday. Photograph: Thaer Al Khalidiya/Reuters
A first round of peace talks on Syria wraps up today with both sides in entrenched positions and the UN mediator expressing frustration that it had not even been possible to get agreement for an aid convoy to enter the besieged city of Homs.
After a week of talks at the United Nations headquarters in Geneva, the opposing sides in Syria’s civil war were still stuck on the question of how to proceed.
Today’s closing session was expected to be largely ceremonial, with government and opposition delegates expected to meet again on February 10th.
“I hope that in the next session, when we come back, we will be able to have a more structured discussion,” mediator Lakhdar Brahimi said.
He was “very, very disappointed” that a UN aid convoy was still waiting fruitlessly to enter the rebel-held Old City of Homs, where the United States says civilians are starving.
Diplomats say that a top priority is to keep the talks process going in the hope that hardline positions can be modified over time.
The sides took a first tentative step forward on Wednesday by agreeing to use a 2012 document as a basis for discussions, but it was clear yesterday that they are still at odds.
Yesterday’s session, however, began with a rare gesture of harmony, when all sides observed a minute’s silence for the 130,000 people killed during the three-year-old war.
“All stood up for the souls of the martyrs. Symbolically it was good,” opposition delegate Ahmad Jakal said.
But the sides quickly shifted back to their disputes. The government delegation accused the opposition of supporting terrorism for refusing to sign up to a resolution opposing it.
“We presented a proposal that the two sides might agree on the importance of combating violence and terrorism. The other side rejected it because they are involved in the issue of terrorism,” deputy foreign minister Faisal Mekdad said.
Damascus uses the word “terrorist” to describe all rebel fighters; Western countries have declared some Islamist groups among the rebels, such as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), to be terrorists but consider others to be legitimate fighters in the civil war.
“The regime today provided a one-sided communiqu?. It wants to confuse ISIL with the people of Syria who took up arms and defended their families,” opposition spokesman Louay al-Safi said.
The 2012 agenda, known as Geneva 1, sets out stages to end the conflict, including a halt to fighting, delivery of aid and agreement on setting up a transitional government body.
While the opposition wants to start by addressing the question of the transitional governing body - which they believe would require President Bashar al-Assad to give up power - the government says the first step is to discuss terrorism.
US and Russian officials, co-sponsors of the conference, are in Geneva advising the opposition and Syrian government delegations, their respective allies.
The 2012 agenda, including its call for a transitional government, was drawn up at a time when Western countries mainly believed Dr Assad’s days were numbered. But the past year has seen his position improve on the ground and diplomatically.
Instead, Dr Assad agreed to give up his poison gas stocks, a complicated process that has fallen behind schedule.
Reuters reported on Wednesday that Syria had given up less than 5 per cent of its chemical weapons arsenal and will miss a deadline next week to send all toxic agents abroad for destruction.
“The United States is concerned that the Syrian government is behind in delivering these chemical weapons precursor materials on time with the schedule that was agreed to,” US defence secretary Chuck Hagel said yesterday.