Dublin does not do enough to protect air quality, says survey

Capital came 18th out of 23 European cities for poor effort yet geography clears its air

Compilers of a soot-free index of 23 European cities have criticised Dublin for not doing enough to protect air quality. The creators of the index, Bund (Friends of the Earth, Germany) and the European Environment Bureau, claim that policymakers responsible for air quality in Dublin are relying on “favourable geographical conditions” to keep air pollutants within EU limits.

Dublin came 18th out of the 23 cities graded on the index for their efforts to protect and improve air quality. While Dublin’s air quality is regarded as good, the survey found that efforts to protect this were poor.

Swiss city Zurich topped the list of soot-free cities and both it and the runner-up, Copenhagen, in Denmark, were praised for policies that included a strong commitment to reducing pollution from vehicles and the promotion of cleaner forms of transport.

Adjudicators said that car numbers in many European cities had been reduced, and that Zurich and Copenhagen had bans on highly polluting vehicles such as diesel cars, trucks and construction machines.

READ MORE

Scoring badly

Dublin scored badly on monitoring pollution from “non-road mobile emission sources”, such as heavy plant and machinery used in construction. The city also ranked poorly for traffic and mobility management, and for transparency about its air protection policies.

While the adjudicators said there had been progress in most cities in reducing PM10 particulate matter – which can cause severe health problems – they singled out Dublin as one of the cities that “were rather inactive . . . because they were, due to favourable geographic conditions, in compliance with EU limit values”. Cities ranked lower than Dublin included Glasgow, Madrid and Rome.

Tim O'Brien

Tim O'Brien

Tim O'Brien is an Irish Times journalist