A couple “fined” by a hotel after they wrote a damning review about it are to be given a refund, a council has said.
Tony and Jan Jenkinson said they received a £100 (€124) fine from a UK hotel after leaving an online review describing it as a "filthy, stinking hovel".
Blackpool Council said today that they understood that the hotel will reimburse them and scrap their "no bad review" policy.
Gillian Campbell, cabinet member responsible for public protection at the local authority, said: “Our trading standards team became aware of this issue last week.
“As a result, we have spoken to the hotel owner and asked for the policy to be removed, which has now happened.
“This is a unique case and not one that we have come across before.”
The couple had stopped at the hotel on their way to Oxford, paying £36 (€45) for a night in a double room.
After encountering problems with the room, Mr Jenkinson to posted a negative review on August 30 in which he branded the hotel a “filthy, dirty, rotten, stinking hovel”.
“Couldn’t believe the state of the room,” the review reads. “If you are offered this place to stay for a fortnight for 10p, you are being robbed.”
The Jenkinsons said they then discovered the £100 charge on their credit card statement a few days later.
When they queried the charge, they were told it was incurred under a “no bad review policy” included in the hotel’s terms and conditions.
The policy said: “Despite the fact that repeat customers and couples love our hotel, your friends and family may not. For every bad review left on any website, the group organiser will be charged a maximum £100 per review.”
The couple, from Whitehaven in Cumbria, are attempting to recoup the money through their credit card company.
They complained to Cumbria trading standards officials, who have passed the matter to counterparts in Blackpool.
John Greenbank, trading standards area manager north, said: “I have worked for trading standards for many years and have never seen anything like this.
“The hotel management clearly thinks that they have come up with a novel way to prevent bad reviews. However, we believe this could be deemed an unfair trading practice.”
Councillor John McCreesh said: “Customers need to be free to be honest about the service they’re getting.
“Other customers depend upon it. Hotel owners should focus on getting their service right rather than shutting down aggrieved customers with threats and fines.
“People should have the right to vent their disappointment if a hotel stay did not meet their expectations and should not be prevented from having their say.”
Simon Calder, travel editor at the Independent, told BBC Breakfast the incident was “completely out of order” but added: “I must say, of course, there is an element of you get what you pay for.”
TripAdvisor spokesman James Kay said of the incident: “While, thankfully, such instances are very rare, it is completely against the spirit and policies of our site for any business owner to attempt to bully or intimidate reviewers who have had a negative experience.
“Where we find evidence of a business doing so, we will take action to protect the integrity of our site.”
The original review is still currently available online.
PA
