Goodbye open plan, hello cubicles: What will offices look like after Covid-19?
Many businesses are considering changes to make the workplace safer from coronavirus
Post-pandemic workplaces: staff at the infection-prevention office at the University of California, Irvine, where protective barriers separate cubicles. Photograph: Alex Welsh/New York Times
The modern corporate office, particularly at tech companies, is renowned for open, collaborative workspaces, in-house coffee bars and standing desks with room for two giant computer monitors. Soon, there may be a new must-have perk: the sneeze guard.
This Plexiglas barrier that can be mounted on a desk is one of many ideas being mulled by employers as they contemplate a return to the workplace after coronavirus lockdowns. Their post-pandemic makeovers may include hand sanitisers built into desks that are positioned at 90-degree angles or that are enclosed by translucent plastic partitions; air filters that push air down and not up; outdoor gathering space to allow collaboration without viral transmission; and windows that actually open, for freer air flow.
The conversation about how to reconfigure the workplace is taking place throughout the business world, from small start-ups to giant corporations. The design and furniture companies that have been hired for the makeovers say the virus may even be tilting workplaces back toward a concept they had been moving away from since the Mad Men era: privacy.
Open floor plans were hailed as essential to collaboration and creativity but are also about cramming more people into expensive office space, a situation that people now realise creates unnerving Petri-dish conditions
The question is whether any of the changes being contemplated will actually result in safer workplaces.
“We are not infectious-disease experts. We are simply furniture people,” says Tracy Wymer, vice-president for workplace at Knoll, a company that makes office furniture and has been engaged by anxious clients, including some of the United States’ largest corporations, to come up with ways to make workplaces less of a health risk.
The actual disease experts say that a virus-free office environment is a pipe dream. Dr Rajneesh Behal, the chief quality officer of One Medical, a primary-care chain that recently held a webinar for businesses on how to reopen, says, “A core message is, do not expect your risk goes down to zero.”
Much of what is known on the subject of workplace and disease transmission comes from studies about workplace transmission of the flu, which shares some similarities with the novel coronavirus, says Dr Lisa Winston, the hospital epidemiologist at Zuckerberg San Francisco General at the University of California, San Francisco. “We know that flu spreads in workplaces among healthy working adults,” she says. A 2016 analysis of various research papers from around the world found that about 16 per cent of flu transmission takes place in the office.
The research also shows that one of the best ways to prevent transmission has nothing to do with furniture or layout; slowing the spread comes from letting potentially sick workers stay home with pay so they don’t feel pressure to come into work. Keeping contagious people at home can reduce transmission numbers by as much as a third.
Another basic step to lower risk, Winston says, is simply having “fewer people in a space”.
That is a concept that runs counter to the workplace zeitgeist of the past two decades. The embrace of open floor plans stretches back to the first dotcom boom, in the late 1990s. It was hailed as essential to collaboration and creativity but is, of course, also about cramming more people into expensive office space, a situation that people now realise creates unnerving Petri-dish conditions.
Wymer of Knoll, the furniture-design company, says his goal has changed from making offices virus-free, which is impractical, to remaking them so that workers feel safer. “We can’t ask employees to come back to the same office,” he says. “Companies feel we have to address the root fear.”
For now that may mean no more shared desks, aka hot-desking or hotelling, elbow-to-elbow seating or cafes where people congregate to chat about a project over a fruit water or hazelnut latte. It could mean more use of materials, like copper, that are less hospitable to germs, and reconfiguring ventilation systems.
Mobify, a Canadian company that builds online storefronts for major retailers like Under Armour and Lancôme, has 40 employees who share space with other start-ups. It’s the epitome of the 21st-century workplace, with side-by-side desks in a row, without partitions, and open space for a total of 100 people at full capacity to congregate for meetings, or for playing ping-pong and pool.
Now, Igor Faletksi, the company’s chief executive, says, “It’s less about fun and more about safety.”
“Huge buffets?” he says. “Forget about that for now.”
Faletksi is contemplating allowing more employees to work from home and even moving headquarters to a new building with better air circulation and more outdoor space. “People want to have safe collaboration,” he says.
Some companies have begun mentioning a return to one of history’s more derided office-design concepts: the cubicle. There is talk also of the cubicle’s see-through cousin, known as the sneeze guard.
“Cough and Sneeze Protection Screens” is how they are being marketed by the California company Obex PE in emails to potential customers. “Plenty of options to fit your style and needs,” the email says, adding: “Decrease person-to-person contact. Practice Social Distancing.”
These guards already have a home in banks and supermarkets, but they are getting a new push into the corporate office space.
“Add tall laminate gallery panels to workstations or benching stations” is suggested in a 12-page Power Point report called Covid 19 and the Future of Furniture, produced by CRBE, one of the world’s largest commercial real-estate firms.
Taller plastic barriers that extend over desks have long been in use at an office run by one of the United States’ top infectious-disease experts, Dr Susan Huang, medical director of epidemiology and infection prevention at the University of California, Irvine. The barriers “weren’t designed for coronavirus”, Huang says; instead, they were meant to maintain a sense of collaboration while cutting down noise. Now the barriers may have an added benefit of creating some biological isolation.
But Huang says that safety in the workplace will require more than plastic shields. In fact, her lab reopened last week, and the first thing she did was hold a meeting to explain the new hygiene rules. At a meeting in the conference room, Huang gave each employee a bottle of hand sanitiser and a mask. “I had to tell them, ‘You’re going to wear a mask all day long,’” she says, “and tell them how to do it right and that they have to do it.”
“And don’t touch your mask without first using your hand sanitiser,” she recalls saying at that meeting.
For smaller companies the changes may be more modest, but the issue weighs just as heavily. Howard Cao, chief executive of Form & Fiction, a start-up incubator in San Francisco, says he has been thinking about changing out the touch pad at the front door to the office that his seven employees share with workers from other start-ups. “We’ll probably have to reconfigure that into something with Bluetooth or a key fob,” Cao says.
Inside the office, he is looking to create physical space or barriers between employees who sit together at long tables. “It may be as simple as a mini-divider between people,” he says. Like a cubicle? Yes, he concedes, although it’s not a nice word for him. “I’ve always been very anti-cubicle,” he says.
The proposed changes to the offices have struck some as more cosmetic than substantive, especially the sneeze guard.
“I call it social-distancing theatre, like TSA security theatre after 9/11,” says Ron Wiener, chief executive of iMovR, a Seattle company that designs standing desks that are used at many large employers, from Google and Facebook to the US department of defence.
In the end, the solution for many employers may not be to spend a lot of money on outfitting their new office spaces but, rather, simply having many employees continue to work at home, as a way to accomplish two goals: keeping people safe and saving money.
This is the punchline of a story about the post-pandemic office makeover. In the name of safety, there is likely to be a long, hard look at money, too. In this case the goals may go together hand in protective glove.
Moving to home offices “has worked really great”, says Susan Stick, general counsel at Evernote, a maker of digital note-taking programs with 282 employees. “You can’t put that genie back into the bottle.” – New York Times