Sir, – Ann Baily (Letters, January 14th), like a number of other recent letter writers, advances the environmental and economic case for the use of nuclear energy in Ireland.
To do this she references a booklet, Nuclear Energy in Ireland – Preliminary Study. It considers in great detail the many aspects of Ireland “going nuclear”. Significantly the study fails to mention, even once, names that are synonymous with nuclear failure – Windscale and Sellafield, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima. The word “accident” is only used three times in the 42-page study and one of those is with regard to how “. . . Ireland can respond quickly to any major accident at an overseas nuclear installation”.
Those who describe the safety of modern nuclear power, and the wonder of small modular reactors, are in reality hiding behind science. They deliberately ignore the messiness of life – the human mistakes, the wars, the unforseen natural disasters.
I trust the science behind nuclear power. It’s the unpredictably of life that I worry about. – Yours, etc,
Opportunity knocks for Brian Gleeson as Munster face formidable Castres
Tiny bowls are the secret to happiness. There’s little in life they don’t improve
Shed Distillery founder Pat Rigney: ‘We’re very focused on a premium position but also on giving value for money to consumers’
John FitzGerald: The power market should reflect that renewable energy is cheaper
SEAN KEAVNEY,
Castleknock,
Dublin 15.