Public Services Card: More than semantics at play

The authority of every state rests ultimately on its position as the sole repository of power

 

The public service card is not compulsory, but it is mandatory. So Minister for Social Protection Regina Doherty told a radio programme last week. Ms Doherty deserves some sympathy for having to fight a brush fire not of her own making, as it emerged that people had been refused social welfare payments because they had declined to present a card.

The distinction she made is a fine one, but worth parsing. Although the two words are often used interchangeably, “mandatory” usually means something which is binding, in order to meet a legal requirement. “Compulsory” refers to something essential in itself ,which must be done regardless of any other factor.

Ms Doherty was therefore correct; the card is a specific requirement for citizens who wish to access a broad range of State services. It is not compulsory for every citizen to have a card. But the expansion of the mandatory requirement to include driving licence and passport applications effectively ensures it will become virtually universal. Perhaps Ms Doherty came up with this semantic distinction herself, although it sounds suspiciously like a post-hoc theological rationalisation by her department.

Is it all, as some suggest, a silly season non-story? The enabling legislation has been in place for many years, and more than half the population already possesses a card, with little evidence of any problems. There is clearly merit, once the right data protection safeguards are in place, in the different organs of the State being able to systematise the range of relationships they have with us.

But there is a core principle at stake here. The authority of every state rests ultimately on its position as the sole repository of power, In countries where democracy and the rule of law apply, that power is held in check by courts and parliament. Therefore, when this State wields coercive power – including the denial of services or travel documents – it has a particular obligation to show clearly and conclusively that its actions are legally robust and absolutely necessary. In this instance, that requirement has yet to be met.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.