Ivanka Trump testifies to Capitol riot committee

Former White House adviser did not seek to invoke any privilege in eight-hour testimony

Ivanka Trump, the eldest daughter of former United States president Donald Trump, who served as one of his senior advisers, testified for about eight hours on Tuesday before the US House committee investigating the January 6th attack on the Capitol, according to people familiar with the matter.

It was not immediately clear how revelatory her testimony was for the committee, but those familiar with the interview said Ms Trump did not seek to invoke any privilege – such as executive privilege or the Fifth Amendment, as other witnesses have done – and broadly, if not garrulously, answered the panel’s questions.

Ms Trump was one of several aides who tried to persuade the president to call off the violence that ultimately injured more than 150 police officers and sent law-makers and then-vice-president Mike Pence fleeing for safety, according to evidence gathered by the committee.

She is not known to have been associated with the more extreme supporters of the former president who spread lies about widespread fraud after the 2020 election and planned efforts to try to keep him in power.

Her testimony came days after her husband, Jared Kushner, who was also a top adviser to Mr Trump, sat for an interview and provided what one member of the panel described as "valuable" and "helpful" information.

"There were some things revealed, but we'll just share that a little later," representative Bennie Thompson, the panel's Democratic chairman, said of Mr Kushner's testimony.

Ms Trump and Mr Kushner are among the highest-ranking Trump White House officials to testify before the committee. The interviews have been closed to the public as the panel conducts its work in secret.

Ms Trump's lawyers have been in talks with the committee since January, when it sent her a letter requesting voluntary testimony. In the letter, dated January 20th, the committee said it had heard from Keith Kellogg, a retired lieutenant general who was Mr Pence's national security adviser. Mr Kellogg had described Mr Trump's refusal to condemn the violence as the mob engulfed the Capitol, despite White House officials – including Ms Trump, at least twice – urging him to do so, the letter said.

Mr Kellogg testified that the president had rejected entreaties from him as well as from Mark Meadows, his chief of staff, and Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary. Mr Kellogg then appealed to Ms Trump to intervene. "She went back in, because Ivanka can be pretty tenacious," Mr Kellogg testified.

Mr Kellogg also testified that he and Ms Trump had witnessed a telephone call in the Oval Office on the morning of January 6th in which Mr Trump pressured Mr Pence to go along with a plan to throw out electoral votes for Joe Biden when Congress met to certify the Electoral College results. The call to Mr Pence was part of an effort to invalidate the 2020 election and give Mr Trump a chance to stay in office.

Mr Kellogg told the committee that the president had accused Mr Pence of not being “tough enough” to overturn the election. Ms Trump then said to Mr Kellogg, “Mike Pence is a good man,” Mr Kellogg testified.

Eastman documents

Also on Tuesday, the committee said it had received 101 documents that conservative lawyer John Eastman had tried to withhold, arguing they were covered by attorney-client privilege. In an explosive court ruling that found Mr Trump and Mr Eastman "likely" committed federal crimes as they fought the 2020 election results, a federal judge in California ordered Mr Eastman last week to turn over the documents – a decision Mr Eastman said he would not fight.

Among the documents is a draft memo written for Rudy Giuliani, Mr Trump's personal lawyer, that recommended Mr Pence reject electors from contested states on January 6th. The judge, David O Carter of the central district of California, wrote that Mr Eastman's memo might have been "the first time members of president Trump's team transformed a legal interpretation of the Electoral Count Act into a day-by-day plan of action".

“The draft memo pushed a strategy that knowingly violated the Electoral Count Act, and Dr Eastman’s later memos closely track its analysis and proposal,” the judge wrote. “The memo is both intimately related to and clearly advanced the plan to obstruct the joint session of Congress on January 6th, 2021.”

The committee has interviewed more than 800 witnesses and plans to interview dozens more. Mr Thompson told reporters on Monday that he had authorised five additional subpoenas that day. Mr Thompson said the committee had ruled out a subpoena for Mr Pence, citing "significant information" it had received from two of his aides, Marc Short and Greg Jacob.

“There won’t be a subpoena,” Mr Thompson said, adding, “We’ve been able to validate a lot of the statements attributed to president Trump and the vice-president without his specific testimony.

“There’s no effort on the part of the committee to get him to come in,” he said of Mr Pence, adding: “We initially thought it would be important, but at this point we know that people broke in here and wanted to hang him. We know that his security detail had to protect him in an undisclosed location in the Capitol. We know the people who tried to get him to change his mind, about the count and all of that. So what is it we need?”

Mr Thompson also indicated that the panel would not be likely to call Mr Trump as a witness. "I don't know anything else we could ask Donald Trump that the public doesn't already know," Mr Thompson said. "He ran his mouth for four years." – This article originally appeared in the New York Times

READ MORE