Kabul airport atrocity offers a glimpse of the chaos to come in Afghanistan

‘All the war on terror gave us was more war and more terror’: Critics rue Biden’s darkest day

The darkest day of Joe Biden’s young presidency left him with no good options. Photograph: Al Drago/Bloomberg

The darkest day of Joe Biden’s young presidency left him with no good options. Photograph: Al Drago/Bloomberg

 

The tempting comparison between the withdrawals of US forces from Kabul in 2021 and Saigon in 1975 has offered diminishing returns over the past 12 days.

Whereas about 7,000 people were evacuated from Vietnam (5,500 Vietnamese civilians and about 1,500 Americans), more than 95,000 people have left Afghanistan in a historic airlift since August 14th, the day before the capital fell to the Taliban.

But nor did the departure from Saigon face suicide bombers. Thursday’s bombing attack by Islamic State in Kabul, which killed 13 American troops and at least 60 Afghan civilians, disrupted the evacuation effort and turned a crisis into a catastrophe.

The darkest day of Joe Biden’s young presidency left him with no good options. He must now decide whether to shorten, maintain or extend his deadline of August 31st for the full withdrawal of US forces.

To cut and run now would leave, by most estimates, hundreds of US citizens and many thousands of Afghan allies stranded in hostile territory. But to stay longer would be to invite further deadly attacks by Islamic State’s local affiliate and, beyond Tuesday, the Taliban itself on huge crowds at the airport.

“Every day we’re on the ground is another day we know that Isis-K [Islamic State Khorasan] is seeking to target the airport and attack both US and allied forces and innocent civilians,” Biden warned on Tuesday.

Body bags

Having already disappointed international allies who craved a post-Donald Trump restoration of American leadership, the president also finds himself in a changed political landscape at home. Conventional wisdom has held that relatively few Americans care about Afghanistan or other foreign policy matters compared with the coronavirus pandemic and “kitchen table” issues.

But now, after the deadliest day for US troops in Afghanistan in more than a decade, American body bags will be flying home, a wake-up call to the insular and apathetic. The nation is in more need than ever of Biden’s empathetic side, not the one recounted in Our Man, a biography of the diplomat Richard Holbrooke by George Packer.

In a private conversation in 2010 with Holbrooke, the book says, Biden argued that America does not have an obligation to Afghans who trusted: “F*ck that, we don’t have to worry about that. We did it in Vietnam, Nixon and Kissinger got away with it,” - a reference to President Richard Nixon and his secretary of state, Henry Kissinger.

This tragedy, however, will feed America’s bitter polarisation and heighten the political temperature. Some Republicans have already demanded that the president quit. Josh Hawley, a senator for Missouri, said: “This is the product of Joe Biden’s catastrophic failure of leadership. It is now painfully clear he has neither the will nor the capacity to lead. He must resign.”

Ideological extremism

In the longer term, Thursday’s atrocity offers a glimpse of the chaos to come in Afghanistan, and just how dismally efforts at nation building and importing western-style democracy have failed. If the group known as Islamic State Khorasan wanted to grab the world’s attention and underscore the limits of US power, it surely succeeded.

Islamic State Khorasan is a sworn enemy of the Taliban and even more ideologically extreme. Its ranks include members of the Taliban who resented their leaders’ peace talks with the US. Its intervention on Thursday suggests the potential for further terrorism even after the Americans have gone.

This comes on top of the Taliban’s own threats to human rights, particularly those of women and girls, the weakness of government institutions and an economy hurtling towards the edge of a cliff. “This is a full-fledged humanitarian crisis,” said Bob Menendez, chairman of the Senate foreign relations committee.

Along with Saigon parallels, it has also been widely observed with frustration in recent days that 20 years’ worth of American blood and treasure in Afghanistan failed to make a difference. On Thursday, as the Pandora’s box sprang open, it seemed possible that it did make a difference - for the worse.

Mehdi Hasan, a host on the MSNBC cable news network, tweeted: “We invaded Afghanistan to fight a terrorist group, Al Qaeda, that attacked us. As we leave, we’re attacked by another terrorist group, ISIS, worse than Al Qaeda, & which didn’t exist when we invaded. I’ve said it before: all the war on terror gave us was more war & more terror.” –Guardian

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.