Magazine has history of controversy with Muhammad cartoons

Magazine’s offices firebombed three years ago after it ‘invited’ the Prophet Muhammad as its guest editor

Charlie Hebdo’s editor, Stéphane Charbonnier, at the magazine’s offices in 2012. Photograph: EPA

Charlie Hebdo’s editor, Stéphane Charbonnier, at the magazine’s offices in 2012. Photograph: EPA

 

The French satirical magazine - where a shooting today has left at least 12 people dead - has a history of causing controversy with cartoons of Islam’s prophet Muhammad.

Charlie Hebdo is a weekly political and social French magazine with no adverts and its content is not influenced by external shareholders.

Its offices were firebombed three years ago after it published a special edition titled Charia Hebdo and “invited” the prophet Muhammad its guest editor.

No one was injured in the attack.

Speaking to the BBC after the attack in November 2011, the paper’s editor-in-chief and cartoonist Stéphane Charbonnier said the incident had only confirmed that it was right to take the stance that it did,” he said

“This tells me we are right to publish the magazine, and we are right to continue defying Islamists and make their lives difficult as much as they do ours.

“If we can poke fun at everything in France, if we can talk about anything in France apart from Islam or the consequences of Islamism, that is annoying.”

Charbonnier, who is also known as Charb, said the attack was the act of “idiot extremists” and not representative of all Muslims who live in France.

In 2007, Charlie Hebdo reprinted 12 controversial cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad that were first published in a Danish newspaper, Jyllands-Posten, and caused outrage in the Muslim world.

The magazine was sued for incitement to racism by two Islamic groups in France, but was cleared by a Paris court.

Charbonnier insisted that the publication of Muhammad caricatures was no provocation, but a signal that free speech was alive and well in the country.

He also said the magazine would not stop criticising whatever it wanted.

On its Facebook page, the paper is described as “weekly satirical, political and social, without ads and or external influences”.

Agencies