North South electricity interconnector could cause ‘catastrophe’
EirGrid strongly defends plan at meeting of Oireachtas communications committee
The North South electricity interconnector, involving a cross-Border network of pylons and high-voltage lines, has met with opposition in Counties Meath, Cavan and Monaghan. File photograph: Getty Images/iStockphoto
The contentious North South electricity interconnector could cause an environmental, health and heritage “catastrophe”, Fianna Fáil Senator Thomas Byrne has claimed.
The plan, involving a cross-Border network of pylons and high-voltage lines, has met with considerable opposition in Counties Meath, Cavan and Monaghan.
It has been strongly defended by EirGrid at a meeting of the Oireachtas communications committee.
“I have no difficulty benefiting the North of Ireland. I would support anything that can lead to better integration of the electricity market on this island and working towards and all-island electricity market,” Mr Byrne said.
“But it cannot be done at the cost of an environmental and health and historical and heritage catastrophe, in my view,” the Meath Senator added.
He said he and the people of Meath were demanding that the interconnector be put underground.
Fine Gael TD for Meath Helen McEntee accused EirGrid of “completely ignoring” the “genuine fears” of people in the northeast who had concerns about pylons.
“I don’t know if you’ve watched football in Meath over the last 20 years but if you have you’ll know that people in Meath don’t roll over,” she said.
EirGrid’s chief executive Fintan Slye said the company had looked extensively at the underground option.
“We have assessed it. We have gone back to that several times to make sure that the option that we’re bringing forward is the appropriate one - in part because we recognise that it’s a difficult, controversial project.
“We want to make sure we’re doing the right thing for the people of Ireland. We have no interest in building pylons or any particular type of solution.”
He said An Bord Pleanála was the appropriate body to provide a view on the project. The company believed the project it was bringing forward was “the appropriate one”.