Man not guilty of Offaly publican's manslaughter

A MAN has been acquitted of the manslaughter of Offaly publican Matt Farrell during the burglary of a pub nearly three years …

A MAN has been acquitted of the manslaughter of Offaly publican Matt Farrell during the burglary of a pub nearly three years ago.

Eddie Wing (31), with a previous address at Roscrea, Co Tipperary, had pleaded not guilty to the unlawful killing of 64-year-old Mr Farrell and to burglary at the Gaelic Bar, Daingean, Co Offaly, on April 1st, 2009.

During the burglary Mr Farrell suffered heart failure after he was beaten, bound with a dog lead and left to die.

It was day eight of the trial at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court. The jury had spent more than four hours over two days considering the verdict.

READ MORE

Members of Mr Farrell’s family cried out when the verdict of not guilty was read out.

Judge Patrick McCartan thanked the jury for their service and said it had been a difficult case given the sad events involved.

The judge extended his deepest sympathy to the family for their great loss. He said he hoped they understood justice had its own way and had to be protected and respected.

During the trial, the main prosecution witness was described as a “jailhouse informant” and he gave evidence that Mr Wing confessed to the killing while the pair shared a cell in the Midlands Prison in late 2009.

This witness, who is not being named, is a convicted burglar and a former heroin addict.

About a month after his release from prison in December 2009 he went to gardaí and told them Mr Wing broke down in tears in front of him one evening and said he had killed Mr Farrell.

There was no physical evidence connecting Mr Wing to the crime and under oath Mr Wing told the court the prison informant was lying, adding that he didn’t know why.

The jury was warned a number of times of the dangers associated with the evidence from so-called jailhouse informants.

They were told that two commissions of inquiry set up in Canada described jailhouse informants as the “most dangerous type of witness” and recommended against their use in trials.

After the verdict had been read out the judge thanked the jury. Mr Wing was remanded in custody at Cloverhill Prison on other unrelated charges.

Judge McCartan told the jury that the prosecution’s case against Mr Wing rested squarely on the testimony of the main prosecution witness, dubbed a “jailhouse informant”.

This man had a heroin addiction at the time of the killing and at the time of going into prison in September 2009.

The court heard he had finished serving a sentence for a number of burglaries and has no outstanding charges against him.

This man told the court that, despite living in the same county, he hadn’t heard anything about the killing until October 2009.

He said this was when he was in the Midlands Prison and Mr Wing showed him a newspaper article about the crime and told him he was getting the blame for it.

Senior counsel Conor Devally, defending, put it to the witness he must have been “living under a rock” during that time to have not heard about the killing, which was a “huge event” in the area.

The witness said he didn’t tell gardaí for at least three weeks after getting out of prison because he was still trying to make up his mind whether to say anything or not. He said he wasn’t aware of any reward linked to the investigation into the killing and said he never received any reward. He said he reported what he allegedly knew because he “wouldn’t like to see any old man done like that”.

Mr Wing said the allegations of his confession were “complete lies”. He said he didn’t know why this man was making them up and added that he could only speculate. He told gardaí he was with a former girlfriend in Portlaoise throughout the night of the offences.

Mr Devally said gardaí had failed to question the informant’s account properly and this was because they were under pressure after a massive investigation had yielded no other leads.

He said the informant was “welcomed with open arms” by investigating gardaí and while this was “understandable on a human level” it was “not professional” and fell short of what the jury deserved.

Forensic scientist Dr Hilary Ramsbottom gave evidence that none of the DNA profiles found at the scene could be matched to any samples taken from potential suspects. These included a DNA sample provided by Mr Wing.