Council raises grave concerns about Raheny development
Some 380 houses and apartments sought for lands adjoining St Anne’s Park
Developers Pat Crean and Greg Kavanagh sought permission to build 107 houses and 274 apartments on former playing fields of St Paul’s College in Raheny, Dublin. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw
Close to 300 objections have been lodged against the scheme, with most local politicians and election candidates opposing the development.
The council has now ordered the developers to make significant changes to the scheme, including scrapping two of the six blocks of apartments and redesigning others that had the potential to “create areas of anti-social behaviour”.
It has also expressed concern about the loss of the existing sports facilities and the quality of life of future residents.
The council will not consider the current application and has given the developers six months to resubmit their plans.
As part of the deal the developers agreed to provide the school with new sports facilities including a Croke Park-size all- weather floodlit pitch, an all- weather floodlit training pitch and a new multi-use indoor sports centre.
However, the council said it had “grave concerns” about these facilities and their effect on future residents in terms of noise and light pollution. “The pitch would be floodlit with six floodlights 18 metres in height. The front elevations of the houses would be located 18.4 metres from the pitch fence and lighting poles,” it said.
The developers were also required to provide replacement sporting facilities for nonschool users of the old pitches, the council said, and it queried how Clontarf GAA club would be accommodated, given the “current lack of capacity for GAA in St Anne’s Park”.
The council also said the new school sports facilities could not be considered as satisfying the public open space requirements of the development.
However, the strongest concerns were expressed over the quality of the proposed apartment blocks. The layout of the houses and apartments was unacceptable and needed to be reviewed in its entirety, the council said. Two of the five-storey apartment blocks needed to be omitted and two more were excessive in length and had archways with the potential to create areas of anti-social behaviour.