Man asks court to order neighbour to prevent rock slides

Paul Lynam of Weirview Gardens, Lucan says falling debris damaging his property

 

A Co Dublin man has brought proceedings aimed at compelling his neighbour to take steps to prevent rock slides and boulders damaging his property.

Paul Lynam, of Weirview Gardens, Lucan has taken the High Court case against Thomas Kelly of Weirview Cottages, Lucan.

Mr Kelly owns a 36 square metre embankment of land located at the rear of Mr Lynam’s property, the court was told. The embankment is seven to eight metres high, vertical in places and made up of soil and rock.

In a sworn statement, Mr Lynam said there has always been some rockfall from the embankment but the amount of falling debris has intensified in recent months.

A 100kg boulder fell from the embankment last May and landed in his back garden where it damaged decking, he said.

An engineer hired by him to inspect the embankment found it was extremely likely removal of vegetation from the embankment and installation of a new automatic watering system, allegedly put in place by Mr Kelly, had contributed to the increase and ferocity of rock fall from the embankment.

If the erosion of the embankment continues, his property and that of other neighbours will become increasingly hazardous, Mr Lynam claims.

Somebody might be killed or injured by a rock fall or the collapse of the embankment, he claims.

He claims Mr Kelly has refused his requests to desist from using the water system or clearing vegetation on the land above the emabnkment.

Represented by Rory Kennedy BL, he wants various orders including injunctions compelling Mr Kelly to take immediate steps to prevent further deterioration of the embankment.

On Wednesday, Mr Justice Paul Gilligan granted Mr Kennedy’s ex parte application (one side only represented) for permission to serve short notice of the injunction proceedings on Mr Kelly.

The judge, who said he did not want to grant an injunction in the absence of the other side, adjourned the matter for a week.

Counsel said Mr Kelly had earlier initiated proceedings against Mr Lynam seeking damages for alleged trespass on what Mr Kelly says is his land.

In that action, not yet heard, Mr Kelly alleges he purchased a parcel of land situated at the rear of Mr Lynam’s property.

Mr Kelly claims Mr Lynam erected decking and a fence over what Mr Kelly says is his land without his permission.

Mr Lynam pleads he has been in adverse possession of the land at all material times since 2003 and in a counterclaim wants a declaration he is entitled to be registered as proprietor of the land in question.