Britain gave the go-ahead for a third runway and another terminal at London's congested Heathrow airport as part of a £9 billion expansion, delighting the aviation industry but enraging environmentalists.
Transport minister Geoff Hoon told parliament today that Heathrow, the world's busiest international airport, was running at 99 per cent capacity.
"This makes the UK a less attractive place for mobile international business ... the airport is critical to this country's long-term economic prosperity," Mr Hoon said.
The new runway will take about 10 years to build, expand traffic to 600,000 flights a year from 480,000 and create new flightpaths across London.
Heathrow, owned by Spain's Ferrovial, handles 65 million passengers a year.
Mr Hoon's long-awaited statement came less than a year after Heathrow opened its fifth terminal after much delay due to opposition from campaigners.
Environmental campaigner Greenpeace, concerned about increased carbon emissions, has bought land on the site of the planned runway and hopes to frustrate the process by dividing it into tiny plots under separate owners.
Heathrow's expansion will force the demolition of a village, Sipson, which has more than 700 homes. "My whole family heritage is going to be wiped out by the third runway," said Jackie Hand, 36, a hairdresser who works in the village. "What can we do when the government takes a decision? We are just a cog in a very big wheel."
Mr Hoon said the government was also setting up a new company to look at the potential for building a high-speed rail link from London to Scotland via a Heathrow hub station.
The opposition Conservatives said last year that if they win the next general election, due by mid-2010, they would scrap any Heathrow expansion and invest in high-speed rail.
Business leaders, who have often criticised the airport's congestion, long queues and delays, welcomed the expansion.
"This is not an easy decision. But this announcement balances the needs of the economy with those of the environment, and provides the right framework for the country's long-term needs," said Richard Lambert, director-general of the Confederation for British Industry.
Opponents argue the development would increase noise and air pollution for local residents and push up emissions, making it harder for the government to meet climate change goals.
Mr Hoon said that as part of the plans the third runway would at first be restricted to 125,000 flights a year.
He also said the government would introduce legislation to ensure expansion met environmental policies. Total carbon emissions from British aviation must fall below 2005 levels by 2050.
Britain is also working on plans to add a second runway at Stansted airport, north of London. When he became transport secretary in October, Mr Hoon said Stansted should also be allowed to boost current capacity by 10 per cent.
Reuters