Michael Carrick denies any input from Ralf Rangnick in Man United team

Caretaker coach spurns suggestion that incoming boss had a hand in team selection

Chelsea’s Jorginho scores his 13th Premier League penalty to drag Chelsea back on to level terms against Manchester United at Stamford Bridge. Photograph: PA

Chelsea’s Jorginho scores his 13th Premier League penalty to drag Chelsea back on to level terms against Manchester United at Stamford Bridge. Photograph: PA

 

Michael Carrick has insisted Ralf Rangnick had no influence on Manchester United’s line-up in the 1-1 draw at Chelsea.

Former United full-back Gary Neville said before kick-off at Stamford Bridge on Sunday that “incoming manager” Rangnick must have had a hand in the starting XI in west London.

But after Jadon Sancho’s second goal in the week earned United a point against the Premier League leaders, caretaker coach Carrick rejected out of hand any influence from the man expected to be hired as interim manager at Old Trafford.

Asked if the German had played a part in Cristiano Ronaldo taking a seat on the bench, caretaker boss Carrick replied: “No, that’s not the case.”

United’s 4-3-3 formation certainly harboured many of the classic Rangnick traits, but Carrick insisted the set-up was mainly aimed at cutting off the supply lines to Chelsea’s deep midfielders.

Neville had earlier said “I’ve a feeling the incoming manager has picked that team as it’s a huge departure from midweek”, but Carrick was quick to give that assertion short shrift.

Rangnick is expected to take up a short-term role as United boss to succeed the sacked Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, with a two-year consultancy role from next summer then on the cards.

Paris St Germain boss Mauricio Pochettino remains the front-runner as Solskjaer’s long-term successor.

On the chances of Rangnick taking the United helm in the coming days, Carrick replied: “As of now I haven’t got any more news for you really. I was purely focused on the game, so there was enough in my head to prepare the boys for this. So after the game now I’m sure I’ll be updated and aware and see what happens in the next few days. But as of now I don’t have anything else to give you.

“We came here with a plan and we kind of knew how Chelsea would play. So that plan was all about stopping the little passes threaded through to Jorginho and Ruben Loftus-Cheek in the middle of the pitch. We were conscious of that. It’s just what we decided to go with today and we nearly pulled it off. At the moment we’re feeling a little bit frustrated and disappointed really, because we came here to win the game and at half-time we really felt like we had a chance and were right in the game.”

Atonement for Jorginho

Jorginho’s mistake gifted United their goal, with the Italy midfielder failing to control Bruno Fernandes’s up-and-under clearance.

That handed Sancho a canter in on goal and he swept past Edouard Mendy without issue.

Jorginho quickly atoned for that error by burying his 13th Premier League penalty to drag the Blues back on to level terms.

And Chelsea boss Thomas Tuchel hailed the 29-year-old’s resilience to secure a hard-fought point.

“It’s very unusual for Jorgi [to make] a mistake like this and to concede a goal like this in general for us,” said Tuchel.

“I think he misjudged the situation and I think he was heavily disturbed from the lights so he did not see the ball. It happened, but then it took a lot of courage . . . to take the penalty for the equaliser in a crucial moment. And I’m very happy that he did. It’s hard to imagine this as a match where you can lose or drop points, because we were the better team . . . We’re disappointed but we have no regrets.”

Tuchel was booked for overzealous protests after Ronaldo was not flagged despite a clear offside as United threatened a winner.

The Blues’ German boss lamented the booking afterwards, but remained frustrated with the incorrect offside call.

“In the end I’m the guy who gets a yellow card and whatever,” said Tuchel.

“But . . . this is a clear offside and later we have to defend a dangerous corner and the second ball from the set-piece. And you can lose games like this. In the end because everybody sees it’s a terrible decision of course, but okay.”

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.