Opinion: Why symphysiotomy records must not be destroyed

The documents constitute an overwhelming body of evidence of human rights abuses

Members and supporters of Survivors of Symphysiotomy protesting outside the Dáil in 2014. For a State scheme to destroy such valuable data on this involuntary childbirth surgery is to violate survivors’ human rights and obliterate the very stuff of history. Photograph: Alan Betson

Members and supporters of Survivors of Symphysiotomy protesting outside the Dáil in 2014. For a State scheme to destroy such valuable data on this involuntary childbirth surgery is to violate survivors’ human rights and obliterate the very stuff of history. Photograph: Alan Betson

 

The assessor to the symphysiotomy payment scheme, Maureen Harding Clark, has reaffirmed her intention to shred applicants’ unclaimed medical records. Underlying this plan appears to be a view that, collectively, they are of little significance, that they can be treated as though they were individual records of a generally accepted practice, such as Caesarean section. This is not the case.

The scheme holds documents belonging to nearly 750 women, up to 600 of whom are deemed to have undergone the controversial operation, which involved cutting the pelvic bone during childbirth. Obstetric notes specify, inter alia, the age of the patient and whether the operation was performed before, during or after labour, generally naming the doctors involved. Contemporaneous hospital records, general practitioner notes, specialist medical reports and radiological evidence, including X-rays, show the injuries caused by the surgery.

The former judge is the custodian of a vast trove of unique records that, with the consent of their owners, should be retained as well as returned. Collectively, these records are vital to establishing the truth about symphysiotomy. The documents belie the official view that symphysiotomy was done mainly as an emergency procedure and that the operation was safe. Ireland was the only country in the developed world in the mid- to late-20th century to practise symphysiotomy as a preferred or non-emergency procedure.

‘Safer’ than Caesarian

The records the assessor proposes to destroy after March 20th constitute an overwhelming body of evidence of human rights abuses. Possible legal challenges to her decisions will also be made more difficult, as the wholesale destruction of records could frustrate future judicial review proceedings. In 2014, the UN Human Rights Committee found the practice of the surgery constituted involuntary medical experimentation involving torture, and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Among its rulings (ignored by the Government) were that Ireland carry out “an independent and thorough investigation” and “prosecute and punish the perpetrators, including medical personnel”.

As victims of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, survivors are entitled, under international human rights frameworks, to an inquiry from the State. They are, by extension, entitled to the preservation of the data.

Dark chapter

To destroy unclaimed records is to compound the silencing of symphysiotomy survivors. The government payment scheme refused, in the main, to hear oral evidence. The scheme first proposed to destroy these records without the applicants’ consent and – often – their knowledge. The box-ticking exercise proposed is inadequate, as is the proposed depositing of records in Hawkins House for collection by elderly, infirm women.

The nature, scale and trauma of this involuntary childbirth surgery and its life- altering consequences render its practice unprecedented in the annals of human rights abuses in Ireland.

For a State scheme to deliberately destroy such uniquely valuable material is to violate survivors’ human rights and obliterate the very stuff of history. We have already seen the deliberate destruction of records in institutional schools, Magdalene laundries, psychiatric and general hospitals. Enough is enough. As well as returning all records to all applicants by post, the assessor should now seek their informed consent to archiving them so they can be made available as an integral collection for future investigators and researchers. Justice and history require no less.

Marie O’Connor is chairperson of Survivors of Symphysiotomy

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.