What China’s actions in the South China Sea mean

How China deals with the Hague’s Permanent Court of Arbitration’s ruling will be telling

 

A great deal is at stake concerning the peaceful conduct of international affairs in China’s dispute with the Philippines over territory in the South China Sea. The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague last week ruled illegal China’s claims to resources within its self-declared nine-dash line there, one of the world’s busiest and most lucrative trading routes.

The Chinese government says the ruling is “null and void” and has “no binding force”. It says the Philippines took the case unilaterally in 2013, after an incident in the Scarborough Shoal when the Chinese navy denied access to Filipino fishermen.

China says the dispute concerns international law on territorial sovereignty and maritime delimitation rather than fishing resources and that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos), to which it and the Philippines are signatories, does not apply. It calls for bilateral negotiation instead.

The Philippine government disagrees and has support from other countries bordering the sea and equally exposed to Chinese claims, including Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, Taiwan and Vietnam. China’s recent physical and military buildup on the disputed Spratlys and Paracels islands in the oil and gas rich sea, through which €3.5 trillion trade passes annually, together with its historically based nine-dash line claiming rights there, is put at stake by the ruling. The line was drawn up after Japan’s defeat in the second World War.

Whatever about the legal complexities involved, the diplomatic and political implications of the ruling are plain to see. China has a choice between multilateral engagement and international law or great power assertiveness in dealing with its Asian neighbourhood.

Its southeast Asian neighbours very much want to see the first approach prevail over Chinese nationalist claims to territory based on ancient tributary relations.

The rest of the world has a deep and vested interest in this choice because a failure to resolve it co-operatively would lead to a further military build-up inescapably involving the US and other Asian powers.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.