Report calls for EU ban on produce from Israeli settlements in West Bank

The European Union must ban produce from Israeli settlements in the West Bank from entering its markets in order to cut off “…

The European Union must ban produce from Israeli settlements in the West Bank from entering its markets in order to cut off “a vital source of revenue which allows settlements to thrive”, says a report by the Palestinian human rights organisation Al Haq.

The trade, estimated by the Israeli government to be worth about $300 million (€224m) a year, is “an essential step in the process of reinforcing and consolidating the settlement enterprise, while simultaneously ensuring the viability of the entire settlement strategy”, said the report, Feasting on the Occupation.

It points out that although the EU repeatedly states that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal under international law, it continues to allow settlement produce to enter its markets. The EU is Israel’s largest trading partner, receiving about 20 per cent of total Israeli exports.

Al Haq estimates that settlements in the Jordan Valley – the large swathe of fertile agricultural land in the West Bank that is dominated by Israeli agribusiness – contribute 40 per cent of herbs, 50 per cent of grapes and 40 per cent of dates exported by Israel.

READ MORE

Profitable

“The flourishing agricultural environment in the West Bank, particularly in the Jordan Valley area, coupled with the exploitation of water and other natural resources found in the occupied territory, has . . . turned Israeli settlements into profitable corporations,” says the report.

Settlement goods are often labelled “produce of the West Bank” or “produce of Israel”, implying it is Palestinian produce or it originates on the Israeli side of the 1967 green line.

An EU-wide policy on labelling has been discussed in Brussels, although officials have rejected a boycott of settlement produce.

Al Haq argues that the EU is obliged by international law to ban trade with settlements. It says that in serious breaches of the fundamental principles of international law, such as colonialism or the appropriation of property, states must not assist in maintaining an illegal situation. – (Guardian service)