Moore St ‘land swap’ deal with developer rejected by council

Chartered Land swap opposed by Sinn Féin, Fianna Fáil and People before Profit

Nuala O’Rahilly Price and John Connolly, grandson of James Connolly, with members of the Save No 16 Committee and Moore Street Traders Association at last year’s launch a new website and virtual audiovisual tour of a proposed Commemorative Centre and Museum, for the 2016 commemorations of the Rising, and the preservation of 16 Moore St. File photograph: Eric Luke/The Irish Times

Nuala O’Rahilly Price and John Connolly, grandson of James Connolly, with members of the Save No 16 Committee and Moore Street Traders Association at last year’s launch a new website and virtual audiovisual tour of a proposed Commemorative Centre and Museum, for the 2016 commemorations of the Rising, and the preservation of 16 Moore St. File photograph: Eric Luke/The Irish Times

 

A “land swap” deal to allow the construction of a 1916 museum on Dublin’s Moore Street ahead of the Easter Rising centenary has been rejected by Dublin City Council.

Numbers 14-17 and number 10 Moore Street, buildings believed to have been used by the leaders of the Rising, were to have be transferred into council ownership to allow the development of a commemorative centre.

The buildings, which have National Monument status, are owned by Chartered Land, which has planning permission to build a shopping centre on a 2.7 hectare site stretching from the former Carlton cinema on O’Connell Street to Moore Street.

In exchange 24-25 Moore Street, council-owned buildings currently used as a waste depot, was to be transferred to Chartered Land but councillors voted against the proposal.

A condition of the swap was that Chartered Land would restore 14-17 Moore Street, currently in a dilapidated state, and complete the museum ahead of Easter 2016.

Campaigners wish to preserve the entire terrace and immediate area as a battlefield site.

Fine Gael, Labour and a number of independents were in favour of the swap proposal while Sinn Féin, Fianna Fáil and People before Profit opposed the plan.

Independent councillor Nial Ring who chaired the council’s Moore Street Advisory Committee said the result was an “insult” to the memory of the men, women and children of 1916.

“The current situation is that the National Monument site will be left as it is because the owner can separately purchase the site needed at 24/25 Moore Street, has a valid planning permission to build a shopping centre and has absolutely no obligation, legal, moral or otherwise, to build a heritage centre” said Cllr. Ring.

Sinn Féin Dublin City Councillor Mícheál Mac Donncha welcomed the vote. Cllr Mac Donncha said: “It is very welcome that DCC, by majority vote, rejected the proposed land swap deal which would have seen most of the historic Moore Street terrace demolished.”

“It is now vital that a full and independent battlefield site survey is carried out. It is also essential that Minister Heather Humphreys brings together all concerned to come up with a new plan to protect, preserve and develop this historic quarter of our city”.

People Before Profit opposed the deal which, it claimed, would pave the way for the destruction of the historic 1916 Moore Street battlefield site, the “last remaining urban battlefield site in Europe, if not the world”.

Cllr John Lyons, a member of Dublin City Council’s Moore Street Advisory Committee, described the proposed land swap deal as “the toxic legacy of the Celtic Tiger period”.

He said if the deal was to proceed “Dublin City Council would be responsible for the destruction of what is, in the opinion of the National Museum of Ireland, ‘the most important historic site in modern Irish history’.”

Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht Heather Humphreys held a meeting with relatives of the signatories of the 1916 Proclamation last month. During the meeting, described as “heated” by family members, Ms Humphreys was presented with evidence of the historical significance of the buildings which are scheduled to be demolished to make space for the proposed shopping centre.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.