Drunk driver, jailed over death of boy, has prison time cut
Portlaoise man convicted of dangerous driving causing death of 4-year-old in 2014
Finbarr O’Rourke had pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing the death of Ciarán Treacy on April 17th, 2014
A drunk driver jailed for the death of a four-year-old boy has had 18 months cut from his jail term following an appeal.
Finbarr O’Rourke (41), of Laurel Drive, Portlaoise, Co Laois, had pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing the death of Ciarán Treacy (4) at Ballymorris, Portarlington on April 17th, 2014. Ciarán’s mother Gillian was also severely injured as a result of the incident.
Judge Keenan Johnson sentenced O’Rourke to 7½ years in prison at Portlaoise Circuit Criminal Court on November 3rd, 2015.
O’Rourke brought a sentence appeal last week and in the Court of Appeal on Monday morning, he was resentenced to eight years imprisonment with the final two suspended.
Giving judgment in the three-judge court, Mr Justice Alan Mahon said Mrs Gillian Treacy was driving on the R419 between Portlaoise and her home in Portarlington, Co Laois, on the afternoon in question.
At Ballymaurice, a Toyota Avensis crossed the road and collided head on with her vehicle.
That car was driven by O’Rourke, who was observed slouched over his steering wheel by Mrs Treacy shortly before impact.
Mrs Treacy received very serious injuries and despite the best efforts of emergency services, her young son Ciarán, aged four, died that evening at Portlaoise Hospital.
“Her seven year old son Seán, thankfully, escaped physically unscathed,” the judge said.
Forensics suggested there was no braking on the part of O’Rourke’s vehicle and that it was being driven at 86km/h in an 80km/h zone.
After the collision, Mrs Treacy recalled O’Rourke approaching her vehicle. However, he walked away and was met on the road by gardaí in a distressed state and was arrested.
He untruthfully told gardaí that he had consumed two glasses of wine.
On being informed that Ciarán had died, he smashed his head through a glass window in the garda station.
O’Rourke had drunk eight to 10 pints of cider over a few hours that afternoon with a Mr Smith. While he was walking away from the scene, he telephoned Mr Smith a number of times and told him there had been an accident and that he believed someone had died. He also asked Mr Smith to come and collect him, the judge said.
In a victim impact statement, Mrs Treacy detailed her own “life threatening and life-long” injuries including four serious fractures, severe lacerations, and a five-week stay in hospital, which included 10 surgical procedures.
“The statement also speaks in the most moving terms of the extent of the family’s terrible loss of their adored young son, Ciarán, and how it has changed their lives forever,” the judgment stated.
The statement also outlined the severe financial consequences visited on the family in the aftermath of the accident.
O’Rourke’s barrister, Conor Devally SC, submitted that the sentencing tariff of nine years was too high and not enough credit was given for due mitigation.
Mr Justice Mahon said it was suggested on O’Rourke’s behalf that the offence was not pre-meditated.
“But while the appellant (O’Rourke) may not have planned to drive with alcohol on board for any great length of time before doing so there was pre-meditation in the sense that, having consumed a great deal of alcohol, he made the conscious decision to leave the public house, walk to his car and then drive for some time before the collision occurred,” he said.
“It was not something he did on the spur of the moment or without thinking.
“The act of driving with a lot of drink consumed was very much a calculated act on his part, and a risk he freely took.”
Mr Justice Mahon said the fact he walked away from the scene in circumstances where he was aware that somebody had probably died and “in circumstances where he must have been aware that Mrs Treacy was severely injured” were aggravating factors.
While he was less than truthful with the gardaí, it is “nevertheless in his favour” that he co-operated with them thereafter pleading guilty at a relatively early state. He had also shown remorse which the court accepted as genuine.
“Although almost insignificant in comparison to the devastating and life long trauma visited on the victims in this accident, the appellant (O’Rourke) will himself have to live with the awful guilt which undoubtedly he feels for the rest of his lifetime”.
Mr Justice Mahon said the maximum sentence for dangerous driving causing death was 10 years imprisonment.
“Interestingly, by contrast in the UK, it is fourteen years,” Mr Justice Mahon noted.
Mr Justice Mahon said it was desirable and appropriate that there be a degree of consistency in sentencing for particular offences.
He said the Court of Appeal’s efforts to establish consistency in sentencing for what might be described as broadly similar offending may appear clinical or “even callous” to the victims of “such a terrible event, as this was, but” it was necessary to achieve as much consistency as was reasonably possible.
The court was satisfied there was an error in principle by the Circuit Court judge in placing the headline sentence at nine years primarily because of the absence of prolonged period of dangerous driving or excessive speed.
Mr Justice Mahon, who sat with Mr Justice George Birmingham and Mr Justice Garrett Sheehan resentenced O’Rourke to eight years imprisonment with the final two suspended.
The period of suspension was primarily intended as a recognition of O’Rourke’s “genuine remorse”, plea of guilty and to incentivise rehabilitation.
The court also re-imposed the disqualification period for 20 years.
His head hung low, O’Rourke made no reaction when the judgment was delivered.
In a statement read outside court, John Browne, on behalf of the Treacy family said “words cannot express their anger, their grief or their revulsion towards the drunk driver who robbed Gillian and Ronan of their beloved son” and their children “of the brother they deserved but now will never have”.
He said: “The family want to acknowledge the court’s decision today, which they hope will act as a warning and a deterrent to others.”
“The family are disappointed but respect and acknowledge the court’s judgment.”