Gail O’Rorke acquitted on two of three charges against her

Jurors asked to ‘go in there, write the words not guilty, come back out and send her home’

 Gail O’Rorke who was on Friday found not guilty on two of the three charges against her. Photograph: Collins Courts

Gail O’Rorke who was on Friday found not guilty on two of the three charges against her. Photograph: Collins Courts



The jury in the trial of a woman accused of helping her friend take her own life has been ordered to find her not guilty on two of the three charges against her due to a lack of evidence.

Following legal argument at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court, Judge Patrick McCartan ordered the jury to acquit Gail O’Rorke (43) of ordering a lethal dose of barbiturates from Mexico, which was later taken by Bernadette Forde (51) to end her life.

The judge also told the jury of six men and six women to find Ms O’Rorke not guilty of “procuring” the suicide of her friend by helping to organise her funeral before her death.

Ms O’Rorke remains accused of attempting to help Ms Forde get to the Swiss euthanasia clinic Dignitas, a plan that was thwarted when the travel agent alerted gardaí.

Judge McCartan told jurors that he was ordering not guilty verdicts in the final two charges because he agreed with the defence’s argument that the prosecution has not produced enough evidence for the counts to go before a jury.

Both parties have made their closing speeches and the jury will begin their deliberations on Monday after being addressed by Judge McCartan.

The defence contend that Ms O’Rorke cannot be guilty of attempting to do something that never happened.

Counsel asked jurors to “go in there, write the words ‘not guilty’, come back out and send her home”.

The prosecution has told jurors that they might not feel good about returning a guilty verdict, but that it is up to the Oireachtas and not them to decide what is and isn’t illegal.

Ms O’Rorke, a taxi driver from Kilclare Gardens, Tallaght has pleaded not guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to aiding and abetting the suicide of Ms Forde by helping her to procure and administer a toxic substance between April 20th, 2011 and June 6th, 2011 at a location in Dublin.

She also denied that she attempted to aid and abet the suicide of Ms Forde by means of attempting to arrange travel to Zurich, Switzerland for such purpose between March 10th and April 20th, 2011 and that she procured the suicide of Ms Forde between June 4th and June 6th, 2011 by means of making funeral arrangements for Ms Forde in advance of her death.

Prosecuting counsel Remy Farrell SC told the jury in his address that the prosecution case “in a nutshell” is that Ms O’Rorke attempted to assist in the suicide of Ms Forde by booking the tickets to Zurich with Rathgar Travel.

He said it makes no difference that gardaí foiled the plan and that Ms Forde or Ms O’Rorke never got to Switzerland.

Mr Farrell referred to a defence argument that 85 percent of people who travel to Dignitas don’t go through with an assisted suicide. He said that it is “entirely irrelevant” whether Ms Forde went through with the act when she got there and that the argument was “a red herring” thrown up by the defence to distract jurors.

In his closing speech, defence counsel Dermott McGuinness SC asked how Ms O’Rorke could have aided and abetted something that never happened. “Flying to Switzerland isn’t suicide or attempted suicide,” he said. “Did you ever think that you could go into a travel agents and book a flight and try and get the tickets and wind up on the wrong end of an indictment? Could you believe that?”

Mr McGuinness asked if a taxi driver who drove Ms Forde to the airport in the knowledge of her plans would be guilty of an offence. He asked would the air hostess or pilot who flew her to Zurich also be guilty of an offence if they happened to know her intentions.