Second Opinion: A reel opportunity to explore complex healthcare issues


‘Just enjoy the film, Dad, you don’t always have to write about it,” is a familiar refrain from my family on our sporadic outings to the movies.

Yet cinema was the great art form of the 20th century and this century is continuing the same way, according to Philip French, the masterly film critic of the Observer who retired this month after more than 50 years in the post.

The broad appeal and high profile of the medium provides a fantastic opportunity for commentary, powered by the cocktail of entertainment, aesthetics and information, that characterises good art.

As a teacher in medical humanities – where we try to open students’ eyes to the complex relationships between medicine, personal experiences of illness, and societal currents – film is a treasure trove for exploring these complex ideas and debates.

In some instances this is a primary focus of the film, such as stroke in Amour and The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, pandemics in Contagion, and alcohol dependency in The Lost Weekend.

Perhaps more interesting are films where the themes are a byproduct of astute perception.

Clint Eastwood almost certainly did not design Gran Torino to be a remarkable commentary on ageing, and the carefully crafted Revolutionary Road provides telling insights into depression.

Last week’s release of Elysium once again showed the opportunity to provoke timely reflection nested in a summer blockbuster.

The first movie from its South African director, Neill Blomkamp, was the superb District 9, a transposition of apartheid into an alien science-fiction movie. By removing the topic from its familiar roots and context, we experienced the horror of apartheid afresh.

In his next movie, Elysium, the themes have a clear resonance with the current debate on US president Barack Obama’s healthcare reforms – for those who are willing to see them.

In an overcrowded, impoverished and polluted future Earth, the super-rich have removed themselves to a huge space station – the eponymous Elysium – with cutting-edge health technology denied to all remaining on Earth.

Rather like current migrants attempting to reach European shores, the desperate pay criminals to try to reach Elysium.

While many die on the way, those who arrive are barred from healthcare and returned, mirroring the current debate in the United Kingdom to charge illegal immigrants for NHS healthcare.

Universal healthcare
In a divided and politically partisan United States of America, opposition to the extension of universal healthcare has often been driven by party loyalty, doctrine and raucous polemic (and the role of the medical profession has not been inspiring).

Perhaps moviegoers from across the divide, on a night out to see a spectacularly executed action and science fiction movie, might see afresh the cruelty of a healthcare system where almost 50 million people do not have health insurance, but in a context that is free of the usual political prompts and spurs.

Class and health
However, at a deeper level, the director has also planted a more subversive message on class and health.

One of the most important discoveries of the past decade has been the recognition that the health of a population depends more on the social gradient – the gap between the rich and poor in a country – than on the average wealth of its citizens.

This is a subtle concept, and one that runs counter to the tenor of much political discourse in the US, despite explaining the relatively poor life expectancy in the face of a high spend on high-tech care.

In Elysium, the instant cure scanners for the rich are clearly not ever feasible at any stretch of the imagination. At the end of the movie and thanks to the heroics of the taciturn hero Matt Damon, we see that these scanners will now be accessible to all, but on reflection we also realise that this access in itself will not fix the huge gulf in health and wellbeing between the impoverished masses and the extravagantly rich super-elite.

So a film recommended to all, and providing entertainment as well as unobtrusively giving food for thought on many levels.

However, the trailers accompanying the movie put me on notice that my next commentary on ageing on celluloid – Bad Grandpa from the makers of Jackass and due for release in October – might prove far more challenging, if not equally entertaining.

Prof Des O’Neill is a consultant in geriatric and stroke medicine

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection


Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.