Support for spending is part of America’s history

Nowadays we simply won’t invest even when the need is obvious

You can get a sense of the ideology at work in some of the documents produced by House Republicans under the leadership of Paul Ryan. Photograph: Aaron Bernstein/Reuters

You can get a sense of the ideology at work in some of the documents produced by House Republicans under the leadership of Paul Ryan. Photograph: Aaron Bernstein/Reuters

 

America used to be a country that built for the future. Sometimes the government built directly: public projects, from the Erie canal to the interstate highway system, provided the backbone for economic growth.

Sometimes it provided incentives to the private sector, like land grants to spur railroad construction.

Either way there was broad support for spending that would make us richer.

But nowadays we simply won’t invest even when the need is obvious and the timing couldn’t be better.

And don’t tell me that the problem is “political dysfunction” or some other weasel phrase that diffuses the blame. Our inability to invest doesn’t reflect something wrong with “Washington”; it reflects the destructive ideology that has taken over the Republican Party.

Some background: more than seven years have passed since the housing bubble burst and ever since America has been awash in savings – or more accurately desired savings – with nowhere to go.

Accumulating cash

And the mismatch between desired saving and the willingness to invest has kept the economy depressed. Remember, your spending is my income and my spending is your income, so if everyone tries to spend less at the same time everyone’s income falls.

There’s an obvious policy response to this situation: public investment. We have huge infrastructure needs, especially in water and transportation, and the federal government can borrow incredibly cheaply. So borrowing to build roads, repair sewers and more seems like a no-brainer.

But what has happened is the reverse. After briefly rising after the Obama stimulus went into effect, public construction spending has plunged. Why?

In a direct sense much of the fall in public investment reflects the fiscal troubles of state and local governments. These governments generally must, by law, balance their budgets, but they saw revenues plunge and some expenses rise in a depressed economy. So they delayed or cancelled a lot of construction to save cash.

Yet this didn’t have to happen. The federal government could easily have provided aid to the states to help them spend. But once the GOP took control of the House any chance of more money for infrastructure vanished. Once in a while Republicans would talk about wanting to spend more. but they blocked every Obama administration initiative.

And it’s all about ideology, an overwhelming hostility to government spending of any kind. This hostility began as an attack on social programmes, especially those that aid the poor, but over time it has broadened into opposition to any kind of spending, no matter how necessary and no matter what the state of the economy.

Sharp spending cuts

Paul RyanSpend Less, Owe Less, Grow the Economy

Or take a Wall Street Journal editorial in 2011 titled “The Great Misallocators,” asserting that any money the government spends diverts resources away from the private sector, which would always make better use of those resources.

Never mind that the economic models underlying such assertions have failed dramatically in practice, that the people who say such things have been predicting runaway inflation and soaring interest rates year after year and keep being wrong; these aren’t the kind of people who reconsider their views.

Never mind that the private sector won’t supply most kinds of infrastructure, from local roads to sewerage systems; such distinctions have been lost amid the chants of private sector good, government bad. And the result is that America has turned its back on its own history.

We need public investment. At a time of very low interest rates we could easily afford it. But build we won’t. – New York Times News Service

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.