Don’t blame Frankfurt bogeyman Trichet for our ills

The senior bonds debacle is resonant because it reflects a profound sense of injustice

Jean-Claude Trichet: Three times he threatened to cut Ireland loose. Photograph: Eric Luke

Jean-Claude Trichet: Three times he threatened to cut Ireland loose. Photograph: Eric Luke

 

Yet more controversy over the refusal of former European Central Bank chief Jean-Claude Trichet to permit losses on senior bank bonds obscures deeper lessons.

Yes, some of Trichet’s actions were reprehensible. Three times, he threatened to cut Ireland loose if Dublin did not submit to the ECB’s will. This was beyond the Pale as engagements go between a government and any member, even an exceedingly senior member, of Europe’s bureaucracy. No doubt about that.

But to suggest that Trichet was “the man who broke Ireland” is as fanciful as it is convenient politically to slather the blame for our woes on some kind of a bogeyman in faraway Frankfurt.

True, the ECB did itself no favours by refusing to participate in the Oireachtas banking inquiry. True also, Trichet left far too many gaps and glossed over far too many serious questions in his imperious appearance before the Institute of European Affairs. To cast him, however, as arch villain is to portray an existential emergency in the State as pantomime.

The senior bonds debacle is resonant because it reflects a profound sense of injustice which will linger for decades. Hapless taxpayers were saddled with a huge, intergenerational bill for the misdeeds of the few, curtailing vital public services as life went awry for many thousands.

From this sorry mess senior bondholders walked off merrily with all their money, their unwise bet proving as safe in the end as the constitutional protection on the pensions of errant bankers. It shouldn’t have happened but it did, and it still seems unlikely that unilateral Irish action would brought Europe’s banking system to its knees. The International Monetary Fund certainly reckoned it was worth the chance.

The Banking Inquiry Podcast

But where’s the proportion?

One of the few, new points of information from the banking inquiry report was the disclosure that the National Treasury Management Agency believed that the State could save €9 billion or more by imposing losses on senior bondholders in March 2011.

Minister for Finance Michael Noonan sought to recover €3.7 billion but Trichet refused in the most strident of terms.

Puny savings

Data points to a rise of some €160 billion in Ireland’s general government debt since 2006, the year before the global crisis began. Some €64 billion went to Ireland’s banks: they received about €2 for every €1 in tax the State collected in 2010, the worst year for revenue collections. The inquiry found that was the banks’ responsibility. Timorous regulation made it worse.

Note, however, that close to €100 billion was taken on to fund the budget deficit. In summary, the overwhelming bulk of the crisis debt was assumed simply to keep the wheels of State turning. This was the outwork of deep recession, made worse by the banking flameout and worse still by accumulated fiscal malpractice. Be they in government in the pre-crash times or in opposition, each of the main parties was criticised for their pursuit of pro-cyclical policy as spending rose and taxes were cut. To be fair to the inquiry, it did not shirk this finding.

All of that seems a good deal more telling – and rather less misleading – than to suggest a French central banker was chief culprit. Although the infamous “Trichet letter” on the eve of the bailout put extraordinary pressure on Irish leaders, a rescue programme was at that point inevitable.

Ireland was shut out from bond markets, which had lost all confidence in the State’s capacity to repay and service its ever-expanding requirement for debt after the blanket guarantee for banks.

The report cites Michael Somers, former NTMA chief, saying the notion of an IMF intervention was always a nightmare.

“We would be writing memos to government telling them to cut back on their expenditure . . . ‘Listen, if you don’t behave yourselves and get your finances under control, the next thing is we’ll have the IMF in here running the show for us.’ So, for me, I felt it was the ultimate humiliation actually for us, as a country, to have the IMF come in to run the show for us.”

Ireland was broke from within. That’s the crux of it.

Failure to recognise that would lead only to a repeat of the saga.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
GO BACK
Error Image
The account details entered are not currently associated with an Irish Times subscription. Please subscribe to sign in to comment.
Comment Sign In

Forgot password?
The Irish Times Logo
Thank you
You should receive instructions for resetting your password. When you have reset your password, you can Sign In.
The Irish Times Logo
Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.
Screen Name Selection

Hello

Please choose a screen name. This name will appear beside any comments you post. Your screen name should follow the standards set out in our community standards.

The Irish Times Logo
Commenting on The Irish Times has changed. To comment you must now be an Irish Times subscriber.
SUBSCRIBE
Forgot Password
Please enter your email address so we can send you a link to reset your password.

Sign In

Your Comments
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the Community Standards. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or by filling out this form. New comments are only accepted for 3 days from the date of publication.