Woman not under husband’s ‘coercive control’ when laundering crime cash, court told

A woman was not under “the coercive control” of her husband, a senior Kinahan Cartel member, when she helped to launder almost €800,000 in illegal cash through bank accounts she controlled, the Court of Appeal has heard.

Deirdre Brady (54), of The Bailey, Castlefarm, Naas, Co Kildare, was given a three-year wholly suspended sentence after pleading guilty to two offences contrary to Section 7 of Criminal Justice Act at the Special Criminal Court.

After hearing the State’s appeal against the leniency of that sentence, Court of Appeal (CoA) president Mr Justice George Birmingham asked: “Did she think the money was coming from heaven, or from a fairy godmother?”

The judge also noted it was once the case in Ireland that a wife convicted of a criminal offence was deemed to have been under the influence of her husband.

“That is no longer the law,” he said.

The offences were committed between January 2014 and December 2014 and involved concealing or disguising the true nature or source of money which had been the proceeds of criminal conduct.

At a sentence hearing last July, Brady’s husband Declan – a senior Kinahan Cartel lieutenant known as Mr Nobody – was jailed for seven years and three months for his role in the illegal enterprise. His mistress Erika Lukacs was given a three-year suspended sentence for laundering €196,864 of Kinahan cash.

Mr Justice Tony Hunt said the women did not receive custodial terms because they did not participate in the underlying criminality that was the source of the cash. The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), however, appealed the sentence handed down to Deirdre Brady on the grounds that it was unduly lenient.

Bank accounts

At the Court of Appeal on Tuesday, Fiona Murphy SC, for the DPP, said the offences involved four bank accounts: a joint PTSB account which Brady held with her husband, and which contained €94,000; an Ulster Bank account which held €347,000; an AIB account with €205,000 lodged in it; and a Bank of Ireland account containing €85,000.

There was also a sum of €34,000 which was transferred to the Druids Glen resort to pay for a family wedding, while €141,000 had been transferred to an Irish citizen residing in Spain known as Thomas Kavanagh, whom Ms Murphy said was known to gardaí. The total amount involved was €770,499, she said.

Ms Murphy also said there was nothing to suggest that Brady was under the “coercive control” of her husband, whom Mr Justice Birmingham described during submissions as a “high-end offender”, when she opened the accounts.

She said there was “no two ways about” the fact that the money deposited in the accounts had derived from “serious criminality”, and there was no evidence to suggest Brady had been pressurised by her husband to open these.

Noting that Brady did not have a glamorous or ostentatious lifestyle, Ms Murphy said: “There might not have been the Gucci handbag or Chanel jewellery, but Brady enjoyed a standard of living that might not have been available to her otherwise.

“Simply because she was married, doesn’t mean she was acting under duress.”

Michael Bowman SC, for Brady, told the three-judge court that in order to establish undue leniency, the State must demonstrate that the original sentence been “a substantial or gross departure from the norm”.

‘Malign influence’

Describing the sentence his client received as being “a close-run thing”, Mr Bowman said the judges sitting at the Special Criminal Court had a “considerable degree of experience in dealing with matters of this nature”.

His client’s husband, counsel continued, had worked for “the most serious criminal organisation this country has ever known” and had been a “malign influence” on her life.

Brady also had “no understanding” that she was helping to fund the lifestyle of a third party, Kavanagh, who was a “main player” in the Kinahan syndicate, counsel explained.

He said that Brady, who is in receipt of social welfare and taking medication for mental health problems, does not live beyond her means. His client, Mr Bowman said, had fully cooperated with the Criminal Assets Bureau and was forced to sell the family home in Celbridge - which had been “legitimately purchased” in the 1980s with help from her father - as a part of an agreement with the bureau.

Judgment was reserved.