The world edged a small step closer to the end of the fossil fuel era on Saturday, but not by nearly enough to stave off the ravages of climate breakdown.
Countries meeting in Brazil for two weeks could manage only a voluntary agreement to begin discussions on a roadmap to an eventual phase-out of fossil fuels. They achieved this incremental progress only in the teeth of implacable opposition from oil-producing countries.
Ireland is supporting the European Union’s decision to accept the Cop30 Presidency text, although Minister for Climate Darragh O’Brien has acknowledged it lacks ambition.
In a statement released on Saturday, Mr O’Brien said Irish support for the text is underpinned by “profound concerns” and that it was “not a choice made lightly”.
READ MORE
[ Despite the fudges and bickering, Cop is still the best hope we’ve gotOpens in new window ]
He said it “falls short of meaningful ambition on the most critical issue of our time – reducing emissions to mitigate the worst effects of climate change”.
Specifically, Mr O’Brien’s statement references the text’s failure to include a “credible roadmap for the phase-out of fossil fuels”, which more than 80 countries, including Ireland, had called for earlier this week.
A lengthy standoff on the agreement around the text had delayed the close of the climate summit. Mr O’Brien said it was a “difficult moment for multilateralism” and a “reality check for the EU’s place in this new world”. He described the text as neither a step forward nor a step back.
The talks were hauled back from the brink of collapse in an all-night session into Saturday morning. The bitter disagreement that almost ended hopes of a deal played out between a coalition of more than 80 developed and developing countries, and a group led by Saudi Arabia and its allies, and Russia.
[ Eamon Ryan: At Cop30 I ask myself, is this really working?Opens in new window ]
There was disappointment from campaigners, but relief that the talks had produced at least some progress. Developing countries achieved part of their goal at the fortnight of global talks, which was a tripling of the financial support available from rich countries to help them adapt to the impacts of the climate crisis. They will receive $120 billion (€104.2bn) a year for adaptation, from the $300 billion developed countries pledged to them last year, but not until 2035, instead of the 2030 deadline they were demanding. Many had also hoped the increase would be on top of the $300 billion.
A roadmap to the halting of deforestation was dropped from the final deal, a bitter disappointment for nature advocates at this “rainforest Cop” held in Belem, near the mouth of the Amazon river.
The agreement among 194 countries – excluding the US, which did not send a delegation – was reached in the early morning after 12 hours of non-stop extra-time talks among ministers in deserted conference halls, and finalised at a closing meeting after negotiations were hauled back from the brink of collapse on Friday evening.
Jennifer Morgan, the Cop veteran and former German climate envoy, said: “While far from what’s needed, the outcome in Belem is meaningful progress. The Paris Agreement is working, the transition away from fossil fuels agreed in Dubai (at the Cop28 talks in 2023) is accelerating. Despite the efforts of major oil-producing states to slow down the green transition, multilateralism continues to support the interests of the whole world in tackling the climate crisis.”
Mohamed Adow, director of the Power Shift Africa think tank, said: “With an increasingly fractured geopolitical backdrop, Cop30 gave us some baby steps in the right direction, but considering the scale of the climate crisis, it has failed to rise to the occasion. Despite calling themselves climate leaders, developed countries have betrayed vulnerable nations by failing to deliver science-aligned national emission reduction plans.”
Poor countries must be supported to cope with a crisis not of their making, said Ali Mohamed, special climate envoy for Kenya. “The 30th Cop has reaffirmed both the urgency of climate action and the disproportionate risks faced by the most vulnerable,” he said.
“Kenya and Africa stand ready to lead in the transition to clean energy, but resilience and adaptation cannot remain afterthoughts for a continent responsible for less than 4 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions. Developed countries must finally honour their finance commitments.”
Efforts to limit global heating to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels, in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement, were also addressed in the final text, but less robustly than vulnerable countries had hoped. Before the conference, countries were supposed to present new national plans on cutting emissions, but they fell drastically short of the commitments needed to maintain the 1.5 degrees limit, which has already been breached but which analysts say could be returned to.
Instead of censuring this failure, the conference agreed to set up an “accelerator” programme to address the shortfall in the nationally determined contributions (NDCs), which will report back at next year’s Cop, to be held in Turkey but presided over by Australia. The text exhorted countries to move toward “full implementation of NDCs while striving to do better”.
The final deal also recognised the “just transition” that social justice campaigners have been calling for, which means helping workers affected by the move away from fossil fuels and towards clean energy. But key provisions on the exploitation of “critical minerals” – which has been accompanied by soaring human rights abuses in some countries – were blocked by China and Russia.
Insiders told the Guardian the talks came close to foundering on Friday, after a hectic few weeks in Brazil that began with a summit of world leaders, held by Brazil’s president Lula da Silva and attended by about 50 heads or deputy heads of state.
High-level ministers from Jamaica, Cuba and Mauritius all spoke there of the devastating impact of Hurricane Melissa. “We did not create this crisis, but we refuse to stand as victims,” said Matthew Samuda, Jamaica’s economic growth minister.”
UN secretary general António Guterres warned of temperature rises that would “push ecosystems past irreversible tipping points, expose billions to unlivable conditions, and amplify threats to peace and security”.
But after the leaders left and Cop30 formally began on Monday, November 10th, discussions among ministers and high-ranking officials degenerated into a bitter standoff. A fire near the delegation offices on Thursday afternoon, in which no one was seriously hurt, forced evacuation of the conference centre and disrupted negotiations at a crucial stage.
When they resumed late on Thursday evening, the rift was clear: more than 80 countries had declared in favour of including a commitment to “transition away from fossil fuels” in the final outcome, but scores of countries – led by the Arab Group, which includes Saudi Arabia – lined up against it.
That opposition forced the relegation of the “transition away from fossil fuels” – which scientists say is essential to staving off the worst impacts of climate breakdown – to a voluntary commitment rather than the legally binding decision many had hoped for.
Teresa Anderson, the global lead on climate justice at ActionAid International, said: “A lack of climate finance is throwing a spanner in the works of climate progress. Global south countries, [which] are already carrying the costs of the climate crisis they have not caused, desperately need support from rich countries if they are to take on any more commitments. Nowhere was this more stark than on the issue of fossil fuels, where specific text once again ended up unfunded and on the cutting-room floor.”
Carolina Pasquali, executive director of Greenpeace Brazil, said: “We must reflect on what was possible and what is now missing: the roadmaps to end forest destruction, and fossil fuels, and an ongoing lack of finance. More than 80 countries supported a transition away from fossil fuels, but they were blocked from agreeing on this change by countries that refused to support this necessary and urgent step.
“More than 90 countries supported improved protection of forests. That too did not make it into the final agreement. Unfortunately, the text failed to deliver the scale of change needed.” – The Guardian
