The sneering backfired on the Yes side
National Women's Council Of Ireland
How the Government lost - and the No side won - the care and family referendums
Even if the Government’s wording were not so wretched, there would be good grounds to vote against it to protest against the process of its creation
Campaigners for Yes-Yes in Friday’s referendums host re-enactment of 1937 speeches opposing Article 41.2
Roderic O’Gorman predicts family and care referendums will pass
Referendum countdown: Here is how many of the most prominent organisations recommend you vote - and why
Proposed changes would not help women and Government has not made ‘cogent argument’, Silenced Protest group says
Small group protests launch of campaign, calling for article in Constitution on State’s recognition of woman’s life within the home to remain
The referendums, due to be held on International Women’s Day on March 8th, would broaden the definition of family beyond marriage in the Constitution
Article 41.2 frames our lives, our society, and our value. It gives the State the oppressive role of keeping women from careers. It copper-fastened draconian policies such as the marriage bar. Many women still feel its impact today in their pensions
Constitutional law expert Dr Laura Cahilane said proposed amendment had ‘completely fudged’ opportunity
Workplace Relations Commission found NWCI entitled to bar protestors to protect other attendees from ‘potentially explosive situation’
The council said that while there are significant positive elements for women, it is a ‘short term budget that will not advance gender equality’
Affordable childcare ‘absolutely critical’ for women’s equality
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE...
How does a post-Brexit world shape the identity and relationship of these islands
Inquests into the nightclub fire that led to the deaths of 48 people
Weddings, Births, Deaths and other family notices