Sir, - Regarding Conor O'Clery's article on April 8th, concerning China and human rights, the question for the West is what methods of interaction will result in gains and benefits for all concerned, including Chinese dissidents?
The condemnations of Chinese human rights policy and the threat by America to link "most favoured nation" trading status to human rights progress will achieve very little. In fact, these actions may do more harm than good, especially in light of China's memories of the Opium War and more than a century of colonial rule. In that context, condemnations are regarded as infringements of China's sovereignty and serve only to increase nationalism and strengthen the position of hardliners within the Chinese Government.
It is generally accepted that China has made progress in the area of human rights. It is interesting to note that this progress has occurred as China's economy has grown. This pattern of change should continue as central control of the economy is loosened. Granted this will not occur overnight, but condemnations and threats will only be counter productive. China will not be bullied or forced to change, but it can and will punish economically states which continue to press the human rights issue in the public arena.
Furthermore, antagonising the Chinese Government, while allowing us to claim the high moral ground, will lead to hardened attitudes among the Chinese leadership. This may further increase the pressure on the dissidents, thereby defeating, the original purpose of the exercise.
If we really wish to change China, a different method will be needed. Constructive engagement, and not confrontation, will best serve the needs of all concerned. - Yours, etc.,
5821 44th Avenue,
Woodside, NY,
11377 US.