There was a good deal of stage management in the presentation of the Windsor Framework on Monday. UK prime minister Rishi Sunak, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and everyone else on the inside of the negotiations maintained the pretence that the deal had not been finalised over the previous weekend, in order to keep its detail tight and to control its publication.
The European Union has shown maximum pragmatism and flexibility consistent with maintaining Northern Ireland’s status within the single market and keeping the Border open. Use of the green and red channel system means paperwork obstacles to free movement of goods, pets, parcels, medicines, plants and seed potatoes within the UK is almost completely avoided.
The EU has conceded that red/green channels and data sharing are sufficient safeguard for protecting the integrity of the North’s dual status for movement of goods within the EU and the UK. From a day-to-day practical perspective, citizens in Northern Ireland will simply not encounter any adverse consequences from the operation of the protocol in their lives.
So, what is the DUP up to now? The simple answer is: saving face.
Economists need to get their story straight on immigration
Stormont votes to retain some EU trade laws post-Brexit for Northern Ireland
Assembly members to vote on extending Northern Ireland’s post-Brexit trading deal
Loyalist activist’s legal challenge to Northern Ireland’s post-Brexit trading rules vote dismissed
Unionist farmers, shoppers, business owners and consumers will have the best of both worlds – free access to the UK and Irish economies. The few red lanes are reserved for goods transiting to the Republic; nobody but a political extremist could reasonably object to their presence in northern cross-channel ports or ask for them to be speckled along the entire land border. They don’t affect sovereignty – whether located in Larne or Stranraer.
Manufactured and theoretical objections based on alleged diminution of the North’s status are bogus; the constitutional status of Northern Ireland is alterable only by the decision of a majority of its voters in a plebiscite. That remains the position. But its economic status is hugely enhanced by dual membership of the EU single market and the UK market.
Because the Windsor Framework will accord a right for 30 MLAs from at least two parties (not necessarily cross-community) to trigger a process in which Westminster can protect the North from any future significant and harmful changes in the single-market regulatory regime, the maintenance of a general uniformity in single-market rules simply does not create any real likelihood of adverse outcomes for the unionist community.
Of course, if the DUP thinks that it cannot rely on Westminster in future to defend unionist interests, the party should reflect on the fact that it has never been the case that the sovereign parliament of the UK was constitutionally bound to do its bidding. The Act of Union and the Government of Ireland Act are effective in UK constitutional terms only as long as Westminster maintains them.
A pivotal moment for Northern Ireland
As for Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Suella Braverman and the remnants of the ERG group, one can only admire the nimbleness of Sunak’s footwork
An emotional Steve Baker, minister of state for Northern Ireland, spoke on Monday about his personal struggles with the effects of fighting the European Research Group and DUP battles on Northern Ireland at Westminster. His sincerity, to my mind, contrasted with the casual and opportunistic negativity in the reactions of Ian Paisley and Sammy Wilson. They seem to me to be grasping at any straw to delay resumption of powersharing at Stormont.
Perhaps they fancy the prospect of rolling the electoral dice once more by forcing an election with a view to outpolling Sinn Féin and securing one more go at nominating the First Minister. Perhaps they think they can devour the political cadaver of Doug Beattie’s Ulster Unionists and see off the hard-core Traditional Unionist Voice challenge. Perhaps the Tories would afford them such a chance.
Beattie now has a chance to endorse the Windsor Framework and reassert his party’s claim to be the voice of moderate unionism. If he fumbles this political Garryowen he will not escape the status of a beaten political docket. For him, it’s now or never.
As for Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Suella Braverman and the remnants of the ERG group, one can only admire the nimbleness of Sunak’s footwork. He has avoided a visible confrontation with them; if they continue their muted brand of political sedition, he can simply marginalise them at his leisure.
Railing against the EU, the United States and reasonable voters increasingly disillusioned with the economic outcome of their decision in the Brexit referendum is stony ground politically; even the Tory press has copped on to the futility of perpetual warfare with the EU.
As a Brexiteer himself, Sunak now has some room to distance himself from the extremists who sold the lie that Brexit would yield £350 million a week to be spent on the National Health Service.
I don’t think that the DUP will be able to meekly accept that Sunak has done as good a job for the people of Northern Ireland as anyone could. In the polarised politics of competitive grievance and victimhood that have held sway since 1998 in Northern Ireland, there is always a premium on acting with dogged irrationality and partisanship.
We can but live in hope.