Failed exam candidate gets right to written paper in ECJ ruling
Paper is personal data: Accountancy student sought script after failing test repeatedly
The European Court of Justice (above) has ruled a written exam paper amounts to personal data and can be accessed by the candidate. The judgment is the culmination of a process lasting over eight years. File photograph: Getty Images
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that a written exam paper amounts to personal data and can be accessed by its author.
The judgment is the culmination of a legal process lasting more than eight years in which an accountancy student sought a copy of his exam script after failing the test on a number of occasions.
CAI turned him down, claiming the papers did not constitute personal data under data protection legislation.
Mr Nowak then sought assistance from the Data Protection Commissioner, but he was told exam scripts “would not generally constitute personal data”.
This provoked a legal challenge, although Mr Nowak’s efforts were rejected by the Circuit Court and High Court. A subsequent Supreme Court hearing led to the issue being referred to the ECJ for guidance on whether an exam script constituted personal data.
Last July, an opinion document issued by the ECJ Advocate General (opinion documents precede ECJ rulings but do not always reflect eventual outcomes) found the content of exam papers did in fact make for personal data.
The Advocate General told the ECJ the Irish Data Protection Commissioner was wrong to tell Mr Nowak he had no right of access to his failed paper.
On Wednesday, the ECJ upheld that view, stating rights of access to data provided for in European law “may also be asserted in relation to the written answers submitted by a candidate at a professional examination and to any comments made by an examiner with respect to those answers”.
“The court holds that to give a candidate a right of access to those answers and to those comments serves the purpose of the directive of guaranteeing the protection of that candidate’s right to privacy with regard to the processing of data relating to him, irrespective of whether that candidate does or does not also have such a right of access under the national legislation.”