Former SF councillor and father have jail terms cut in waterboading case
Jonathan Dowdall and his father admitted false imprisonment, threats
Jonathan Dowdall was resentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment, with the final 25 months suspended.
A former Sinn Féin councillor and his father, both of whom were jailed for torturing a man they said they suspected of trying to defraud them, have had their jail terms cut on appeal.
Jonathan Dowdall (39), with an address on the Navan Road, Dublin 7, and his father Patrick Dowdall (61), of the same address, had both pleaded guilty at the non-jury Special Criminal Court to falsely imprisoning Alexander Hurley and threatening to kill him at Jonathan’s family home on January 15th, 2015.
Footage recorded on a mobile phone was shown to the court of Jonathan Dowdall wearing a balaclava and holding a tea-towel to the man’s face before pouring water over his head, in what is commonly known as waterboarding. Patrick Dowdall was heard threatening to pull off Mr Hurley’s fingers one by one with pliers.
Jonathan Dowdall was sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and Patrick Dowdall eight years’ imprisonment by the three-judge court on June 1st, 2017.
The father and son had their jail terms cut on Monday, with the Court of Appeal resentencing Jonathan Dowdall to 10 years’ imprisonment with the final 25 months suspended, and Patrick Dowdall to seven with the final three years suspended.
Giving judgment in the three-judge court, Mr Justice Alan Mahon said the Special Criminal Court’s criticisms of the decision to set a Newton Hearing, or hearing to challenge Mr Hurley’s credibility in respect of certain issues, was “not justified”. The criticisms by the court, and the consequences that followed, amounted to an error in principle, the judge said.
Furthermore, the court’s description of the Dowdalls’ having entered guilty pleas at a “very late stage” also amounted to an error. While the Dowdalls’ guilty pleas could have been earlier, Mr Justice Mahon said, they were entered two months before the trial date, could not accurately be described as “very late” and were of value.
Finally, he said the men’s lack of previous convictions for men aged 39 and 61 (save for one road traffic matter in respect of Jonathan Dowdall) meant the offending in this case could be considered “out of character” for both men. Both had good employment histories and Patrick Dowdall had significant health issues and lived daily with the possibly of “premature death” making prison more difficult for him.
Mr Justice Mahon, who sat with Mr Justice John Edwards and Mr Justice John Hedigan, resentenced Jonathan Dowdall to 10 years’ imprisonment with the final 25 months suspended, and Patrick Dowdall to seven years’ imprisonment, with the final three suspended.