Jury told rape case unreliable

The jury in the trial of a Garda sergeant accused of raping a woman in a Co Donegal Garda station has been told he must be acquitted…

The jury in the trial of a Garda sergeant accused of raping a woman in a Co Donegal Garda station has been told he must be acquitted because the prosecution evidence is unreliable.

Mr Michael O'Higgins SC, defending, told the jury in his closing address at the Central Criminal Court yesterday that there were "seismic shifts" in the accounts of the alleged rape and in her evidence in court by the complainant.

Mr O'Higgins noted she originally claimed she had resisted kissing by the accused but after several days of evidence, she agreed she had participated in French kissing with him in the station.

Mr O'Higgins asked the jury to consider that she gave different accounts of why she had secreted the clothes she wore in the incident in a bag she was to bring back to her workplace.

READ MORE

He recalled also that the complainant walked from the station with the sergeant after the alleged rape and gave evidence that he directed her to his son's bedroom.

"What rapist is going to bring the woman he raped into the bosom of his family home afterwards? What rapist is then going to direct the woman he raped to his son's bedroom when the first question is going to be what the hell is going on here?" Mr O'Higgins asked.

He also noted to the jury that a woman whom the complainant contacted about the morning-after pill said in court she had not discussed her evidence with anyone, but this was contradicted by the complainant's sister.

It was revealed that witnesses had exchanged their statements as well as discussed their evidence while driving in the same car. It was that woman, he claimed, who was pivotal in the making of the rape charge, as the complainant had not said anything initially about rape.

Mr O'Higgins said the authorities had set the full force of the law on the accused to such an extent that contradictions in the complainant's statements were not properly investigated. She was allowed to shape her evidence to suit the forensic evidence in the case.

He recalled that the defence had produced photographs to show that the accused did not have hairy legs as claimed by the complainant and said that while being interviewed, he had dropped his trousers to show investigating gardaí that that was so.

Despite this, Mr O'Higgins said, the prosecution attempted to question the validity of the defence photographs.

The 55-year-old accused man denies raping and sexually assaulting the 25-year-old woman in their local Garda station on June 21st, 2000. It was the 11th day of the trial which is expected to end this week. The hearing continues before Mr Justice Abbott and a jury of six men and six women.