The High Court has given permission for Frank Dunne to pursue judicial review challenges over workers’ access to his stud farm lands for an electricity line upgrade.
Mr Dunne, of the Dunnes Stores retail family, was the owner and trainer of Stanerra, the only Irish horse to win the prestigious Japan Cup.
He and horse breeder Ann Marshall, along with their company Hamwood Stud Unlimited, have taken two separate but interrelated actions over the ESB and Eirgrid’s plans to refurbish the 22km electricity line between Maynooth and Woodland in Counties Kildare and Meath.
Mr Dunne and Ms Marshall say the intended works, which require access to their lands in Dunboyne, will have a “significant effect” on their prize bloodstock and breeding operations.
Rail disruption hell: ‘There has not been one day without delays on the train’
The top 25 women’s sporting moments of the year: top spot revealed with Katie Taylor, Rhasidat Adeleke and Kellie Harrington featuring
Father’s U-turn in a will left son who took care of him with a pittance
The Guildford Four’s Paddy Armstrong: ‘People thought I was going to be bitter and twisted when I came out of prison’
They fear that if works take place on the site with machinery now there is a “real prospect” of foetal loss among their mares and cows. Any disruption to operations may damage Hamwood Stud’s worldwide reputation, they add.
The stud farm owners became aware of the intended works when the ESB issued them with a wayleave notice last February, saying it would require access to their lands. This came on foot of impugned statutory declarations by Kildare and Meath County Councils that these EirGrid line works were exempt developments.
In a draft development plan, Eirgrid says upgrades to the line are required due to constraints on the transmission network and to secure additional capacity. The refurbishment should extend the 220kV line’s operational life for 35 years, it says.
In their High Court action, the horse breeders claim errors were made at various stages of the planning process as there is an alleged “direct link” between the line project and the development of a substation for multinational technology firm Intel. They claim these projects should have been considered cumulatively but were not.
The pair say Kildare and Meath County Councils wrongly relied on Eirgrid’s “erroneous” report in declaring the line project was exempt from requiring planning permission when it should have been considered together with the substation project.
It is also claimed the procedure governing applications for exempted development under the Planning and Development Act 2016 is contrary to European Union law.
Further, Mr Dunne and Ms Marshall allege there were various deficiencies in the environmental screening of the effects of these two projects together, contrary to the Habitats Directive. They also argue their right to public participation in the planning process has been breached.
Their case is against Kildare County Council, Meath County Council, Eirgrid plc, the Attorney General and Ireland.
In their second action, against the ESB, the Attorney General, and Ireland, with Eirgrid on notice, they seek an order quashing the ESB’s decision to issue wayleave notices in relation to the access of their land.
They are asking for various declarations regarding the alleged invalidity of sections of the Electricity Act 1927 in circumstances where a landowner allegedly has no right of appeal over the issuing of a wayleave notice. Their challenge in this action is based on a number of domestic and European law grounds.
Mr Justice Charles Meenan granted permission on an ex parte basis (only one side was represented in court) for the applicants to bring their judicial review actions. He adjourned the matters.
