Trading history: auction houses trumpet Irish ‘independence sales’
Opinion: Why don’t philanthropists buy our historical artefacts and donate them to the State?
In 2006 the family of Joseph McCrossan donated a copy of the 1916 Proclamation of Independence to the National Museum of Ireland. The copy was found by Mary McCrossan at the GPO on Easter Monday 1916. Photograph: Dara Mac Dónaill
Auction houses have been gleefully trumpeting their “independence sales” in recent times, as they seek to drum up business selling Irish historical memorabilia from the 1916-1923 period.
Whyte’s in Dublin has made much of its auction next month, which includes an Irish Tricolour that flew over one of the buildings occupied by the Irish Volunteers during the 1916 Rising. This flag was sold at auction in Dublin in 2007 for €20,000 by a private Irish collector and is expected to reach up to €50,000. There is an obvious home for this flag, and it’s not with a private collector, investor or speculator; it belongs in the National Museum in Collins Barracks.
There is something unseemly about this kind of historical artefact being traded in this way, but it is equally a pity that those who have the wealth to buy them do not see fit to donate them to the State, thereby bringing significant pieces of our heritage into public ownership.
After all, the National Museum exists to “collect, preserve, promote and exhibit” this heritage. But how can national cultural institutions compete with wealthy private collectors and in any case, why should they have to?
In 2006, then minister for arts John O’Donoghue suggested the State could make funds available for material of “exceptional” importance, but he was vague on specifics and little was done to stop valuable material remaining in private hands or leaving the State.
At that time, the director of the National Museum, Dr Pat Wallace, and taoiseach Bertie Ahern attended a pre-auction viewing of War of Independence material being sold at joint auction. Wallace said, rather ruefully, the museum would be bidding “on some of the smaller items”.
But the main media interest during that Celtic Tiger era was on the price of 1916 proclamations. One had been sold in 2004 for €390,000 and they were being written about as investments . Clearly the recession affected on their value; another was sold for €240,000 in 2010.
At the time of these auctions, ministers said government did not have to concern itself as there were already three 1916 proclamations in State ownership. But these “independence sales” are about a lot more than proclamations or Tricolours. Much is made of the rareness of other documents, and those described in Whyte’s current catalogue as of “immense historical importance”.
The current Whyte’s catalogue is also littered with 1916 service and War of Independence service medals, awarded in 1941 and 1942 to honour veterans. It is sad to see such items doing the rounds of auction houses; a service medal might set you back €500, but why should you have it if neither you nor your family have any connection to it? Surely that amounts to a debasement of these medals and what they represent?
And what of the items on sale that should be in the National Archives, as they were generated by the Dáil Éireann administration from 1919 to 1921? There is material from the departments of local government and finance of that period, typed on official Dáil Éireann paper.
Saddest and most ironic of all is the sale, with an estimated price of between €5,000 and €7,000, of the 1916 service medal of William Partridge, awarded posthumously in a presentation box accompanied by a slip of paper with the words “with the compliments of the President of Ireland”.
Partridge was a militant revolutionary socialist and a captain in the Irish Citizen Army who fought in 1916; he was imprisoned afterwards and died the following year. He had also been one of the foremost figures of the 1913 Lockout. A century later, his medal is locked in an auction house, waiting to be sold to the highest bidder.
It, and much more like it, should be released and placed in public ownership by a patriotic philanthropist; or, indeed, could be bought by Heather Humphreys and sent to the National Museum “with the compliments of the Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht”.