Romney under pressure to define foreign policy


MITT ROMNEY will arrive in London today pursued by calls from Barack Obama’s administration to use his first overseas tour as the Republican presidential candidate to define a foreign policy that amounts to more than criticising the US president.

Mocked for his description of Russia as the US’s leading geopolitical foe and criticised for “posturing” over a military attack on Iran, Mr Romney hopes to use his visits to Britain, Israel and Poland over the next week to counter the perception that he has a tenuous grip on foreign affairs.

Convention has it that contenders for the White House do not attack the president while on foreign soil but the Obama campaign invited just that when it challenged Mr Romney to use two scheduled speeches to spell out what he would do differently.

“I don’t know how you give a major foreign policy speech and not give the policy details,” said Robert Gibbs, a former White House spokesman and now an Obama campaign adviser. “The bar really is whether or not Mitt Romney is finally ready to shed a little light on what appears to be the secrecy of his foreign policy plans.”

The Romney campaign said the three countries on the tour itinerary were chosen as “pillars of liberty” and for their strong ties to the US. It said the intent was to demonstrate a resolute stand with places that share America’s values – a hint at the Republican contender’s claim that Mr Obama has let down Washington’s friends abroad while offering grovelling apologies to its enemies.

In London Mr Romney’s meetings with prime minister David Cameron, his deputy Nick Clegg and Labour Party leader Ed Miliband, will permit him for the first time to project himself as a politician capable of reaching beyond his limited political experience as a state governor.

Mr Romney will also meet chancellor George Osborne – a chance to ally himself with an economic strategy of deep cuts to public spending.

The Republican contender plans to attend the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games, providing an opportunity to remind US voters of his claim to have saved the 2002 Salt Lake City winter Games from meltdown.

His trip to Israel is the most likely to have political impact back home, not least as Mr Romney attempts to rally conservative Christian evangelical voters who are strong supporters of Israel but sceptical about his Mormon faith.

Mr Romney’s team said he was going to “learn and listen”, but the Obama campaign is piling pressure on Mr Romney to clarify his criticism of the president’s approach to Iran’s nuclear programme. It has homed in on Mr Romney’s claim that Mr Obama is not strong enough in confronting Tehran and too weak in failing to promise unconditional support for Israel if it attacks Iran.

Colin Kahl, a former defence department official in the Obama administration, challenged Mr Romney for failing to explain what he would do that was different to the White House’s approach of putting an emphasis on sanctions and diplomacy while saying the use of force remains a final option.

“If Romney thinks it’s time to use military action against Iran and abandon diplomacy this early, I think he owes it to the American people to actually say so,” Mr Kahl said.

That may be a hard subject to avoid in Jerusalem. Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu will be looking for support on his Iran policy, which is rooted in deep scepticism that sanctions and diplomacy will work. Israel says there is a rapidly shrinking window in which to carry out an effective military attack against Tehran’s nuclear facilities. There is little evidence however of an appetite among most US voters for a conflict with Iran.

Mr Romney has also derided Mr Obama’s testy relationship with Netanyahu as endangering Israel’s security. He has criticised the president for public differences with the Israeli leader over the expansion of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Support for Mr Netanyahu on the settlements and the lack of progress on an agreement with the Palestinians will play well with Christian evangelicals in the US but is not likely to do much to enhance Romney’s foreign policy credentials more broadly.

Michèle Flournoy, a former undersecretary of defence in the Obama administration, challenged Mr Romney to say how he would address these complex foreign policy issues.

“We face a number of challenges going forward and they can’t be faced with political talking points and platitudes and criticising your opponent. They really require serious people with serious ideas and people who understand the complexity of the world we live in,” she said. “Romney hasn’t really told us yet how we would confront these challenges.”

Mr Romney’s spokesman, Ryan Williams, said: “In no region of the world is our country’s influence any stronger than it was four years ago. President Obama has failed to restore our economy, is weakening our military with devastating defence cuts, and has diminished our moral authority.”

There is little doubt that Mr Netanyahu would prefer to see Mr Romney in the White House. They have known each other since the 1970s, when they both worked at the Boston Consulting Group. It remains to be seen whether Mr Netanyahu will risk further alienating Mr Obama with tacit shows of support for Mr Romney without being confident of a Republican victory.

Mr Romney ends his tour in Poland at the invitation of its former president Lech Walesa, a founder of the Solidarity movement that brought down the country’s communist government. – (Guardian service)