Aer Lingus wins case over Belfast airport contract

Judge looking to levy half of airport’s legal costs against airline because ‘elusive’ presentation of case wasted court time

Aer Lingus was not under a 10-year contractual obligation to fly out of Belfast International Airport, a High Court judge ruled today.

The airline was being sued for £20 million in damages over its decision to quit Aldergrove and move its operation to the rival George Best Belfast City Airport in 2012.

But, rejecting claims that the switch was in breach of contract, Mr Justice Weatherup held that Aer Lingus only had a pricing agreement with Belfast International for using it as a base. He said: "I do not consider the language of agreement is the language of obligation."

A further hearing on the manner of the airline’s exit is expected to focus on the amount of notice given.


The carrier’s departure came mid-way through an alleged 10-year deal to fly from Aldergrove. Legal action issued by BIA centred on the terms of an agreement said to have been reached back in June 2007.

Counsel for the airport claimed a letter drawn up at the time and sent to Aer Lingus by his client’s former managing director amounted to a binding 10-year contract. The letter followed months of negotiations as the airline sought to establish a base outside the Irish Republic.

Issues under discussion were said to include charging rates and £900,000 in launch support for the three Airbus A320s over the first three years.

A senior Belfast International Airport executive told the court it was then “blind-sided” by Aer Lingus negotiating with its main competitor at Belfast City Airport.

But the airline's chief executive insisted it only ever entered into a pricing arrangement for flying out of Aldergrove. According to Stephen Kavanagh his company lost up to €44 million from having a base there.

The move to Belfast City occurred because Aer Lingus could not make its arrangement at BIA work, the court heard.

Ruling on the case, Mr Justice Weatherup admonished Aer Lingus for wasting time and being “elusive” in setting out its position on the contractual arrangement.

But after exploring all the evidence, he said: “I’m not satisfied that the plaintiff’s claim that the agreement established for the use of Belfast International Airport as a base for three aircraft imposed an obligation on Aer Lingus to operate a base for 10 years.”

The judge added that, if the agreement had been drawn up in more legal terms by solicitors, it may have achieved more – although perhaps then the airline would not have signed up to it.

A further question on whether Aer Lingus was entitled to terminate the arrangement in the way it did is still to be determined, he pointed out.

Mr Justice Weatherup also noted: “The plaintiff BIA and Belfast City Airport are unique in being half an hour away [from each other] in a regional centre. Each is competing with the other.

“To have Aer Lingus based at BIA, it seems to me, was a coup for BIA.”

Turning to the costs of the case, involving a six-day hearing, he said expense was created by the airline’s equivocation over the agreement.

“I’m minded to order the defendant to pay half the plaintiff’s costs because of the time that has been engaged in what I consider to have been an unnecessary examination of the issues.”